Re: [PATCH V8 04/10] cxl/pci: Create auxiliary devices for each DOE mailbox

Ira Weiny
2022-04-29T17:21:12Z

On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 04:55:02PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 13:32:31 -0700
> ira.weiny@intel.com wrote:
>
> > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> >

[snip]

> > +
> > +/**
> > + * cxl_pci_create_doe_devices - Create auxiliary bus DOE devices for all DOE
> > + * mailboxes found
> > + *
> > + * @pci_dev: The PCI device to scan for DOE mailboxes
> > + *
> > + * There is no coresponding destroy of these devices. This function associates
> > + * the DOE auxiliary devices created with the pci_dev passed in. That
> > + * association is device managed (devm_*) such that the DOE auxiliary device
> > + * lifetime is always less than or equal to the lifetime of the pci_dev.
> > + *
> > + * RETURNS: 0 on success -ERRNO on failure.
> > + */
> > +static int cxl_pci_create_doe_devices(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > + bool use_irq = true;
> > + int irqs = 0;
> > + u16 off = 0;
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + pci_doe_for_each_off(pdev, off)
> > + irqs++;
> I believe this is insufficient because there may be other irqs in use
> on the device.

I did not think that was true for any current CXL device. From what I could
tell all CXL devices would be covered by this simple calculation. I left it to
the reader to determine if a new CXL device came along which needed other irq's
to lift this somewhere to cover those allocations. I probably should have made
some comment. Sorry.

> In a similar fashion to that done in pcie/portdrv_core.c
> I think we need to instead find the maximum msi/msix vector number
> by reading the config space.

I was not aware I could do that...

> Then we request one more vector
> than that max value to ensure the vector we need has been requested.

Yea at some point I figured this would be lifted out of here as part of a
larger 'allocate all the vectors for the device' function.

But for now this is the only place that needs irqs so I punted. I can lift
this into something like

cxl_pci_alloc_irq_vectors(...) and then pass use_irq here.

But to move this series forward I would propose that
cxl_pci_alloc_irq_vectors() do what I'm doing here for now.

Ira

>
> Jonathan
>
> > + pci_info(pdev, "Found %d DOE mailbox's\n", irqs);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Allocate enough vectors for the DOE's
> > + */
> > + rc = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, irqs, irqs, PCI_IRQ_MSI |
> > + PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
> > + if (rc != irqs) {
> > + pci_err(pdev,
> > + "Not enough interrupts for all the DOEs; use polling\n");
> > + use_irq = false;
> > + /* Some got allocated; clean them up */
> > + if (rc > 0)
> > + cxl_pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
> > + } else {
> > + /*
> > + * Enabling bus mastering is require for MSI/MSIx. It could be
> > + * done later within the DOE initialization, but as it
> > + * potentially has other impacts keep it here when setting up
> > + * the IRQ's.
> > + */
> > + pci_set_master(pdev);
> > + rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev,
> > + cxl_pci_free_irq_vectors,
> > + pdev);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > + }
> > +
> > + pci_doe_for_each_off(pdev, off) {
> > + struct auxiliary_device *adev;
> > + struct cxl_doe_dev *new_dev;
> > + int id;
> > +
> > + new_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*new_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!new_dev)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + new_dev->pdev = pdev;
> > + new_dev->cap_offset = off;
> > + new_dev->use_irq = use_irq;
> > +
> > + /* Set up struct auxiliary_device */
> > + adev = &new_dev->adev;
> > + id = ida_alloc(&pci_doe_adev_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (id < 0) {
> > + kfree(new_dev);
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + adev->id = id;
> > + adev->name = DOE_DEV_NAME;
> > + adev->dev.release = cxl_pci_doe_dev_release;
> > + adev->dev.parent = dev;
> > +
> > + if (auxiliary_device_init(adev)) {
> > + cxl_pci_doe_dev_release(&adev->dev);
> > + return -EIO;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (auxiliary_device_add(adev)) {
> > + auxiliary_device_uninit(adev);
> > + return -EIO;
> > + }
> > +
> > + rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, cxl_pci_doe_destroy_device,
> > + adev);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int cxl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> > {
> > struct cxl_register_map map;
> > @@ -630,6 +753,10 @@ static int cxl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> > if (rc)
> > return rc;
> >
> > + rc = cxl_pci_create_doe_devices(pdev);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > +
> > cxl_dvsec_ranges(cxlds);
> >
> > cxlmd = devm_cxl_add_memdev(cxlds);
>