Re: [PATCH v5 10/12] iommu: Prepare IOMMU domain for IOPF

Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-05-03T18:22:31Z

On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 09:48:40AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> This adds some mechanisms around the iommu_domain so that the I/O page
> fault handling framework could route a page fault to the domain and
> call the fault handler from it.
>
> Add pointers to the page fault handler and its private data in struct
> iommu_domain. The fault handler will be called with the private data
> as a parameter once a page fault is routed to the domain. Any kernel
> component which owns an iommu domain could install handler and its
> private parameter so that the page fault could be further routed and
> handled.
>
> A new helper iommu_get_domain_for_dev_pasid() which retrieves attached
> domain for a {device, PASID} is added. It will be used by the page fault
> handling framework which knows {device, PASID} reported from the iommu
> driver. We have a guarantee that the SVA domain doesn't go away during
> IOPF handling, because unbind() waits for pending faults with
> iopf_queue_flush_dev() before freeing the domain. Hence, there's no need
> to synchronize life cycle of the iommu domains between the unbind() and
> the interrupt threads.
>
> This also prepares the SVA implementation to be the first consumer of
> the per-domain page fault handling model.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> include/linux/iommu.h | 12 +++++++
> drivers/iommu/iommu-sva-lib.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 21 +++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 98 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> index 19718939d9df..1164524814cb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> @@ -102,6 +102,9 @@ struct iommu_domain {
> struct iommu_domain_geometry geometry;
> struct iommu_dma_cookie *iova_cookie;
> struct iommu_sva_ioas *sva_ioas;
> + enum iommu_page_response_code (*iopf_handler)(struct iommu_fault *fault,
> + void *data);
> + void *fault_data;
> };
>
> static inline bool iommu_is_dma_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> @@ -686,6 +689,9 @@ int iommu_attach_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid);
> void iommu_detach_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid);
> +struct iommu_domain *
> +iommu_get_domain_for_dev_pasid(struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid);
> +
> #else /* CONFIG_IOMMU_API */
>
> struct iommu_ops {};
> @@ -1055,6 +1061,12 @@ static inline void iommu_detach_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid)
> {
> }
> +
> +static inline struct iommu_domain *
> +iommu_get_domain_for_dev_pasid(struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_IOMMU_API */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_SVA
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva-lib.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva-lib.c
> index 992388106da0..05a7d2f0e46f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva-lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva-lib.c
> @@ -135,6 +135,69 @@ static void iommu_sva_ioas_put(struct iommu_sva_ioas *ioas)
> }
> }
>
> +/*
> + * I/O page fault handler for SVA
> + *
> + * Copied from io-pgfault.c with mmget_not_zero() added before
> + * mmap_read_lock().
> + */
> +static enum iommu_page_response_code
> +iommu_sva_handle_iopf(struct iommu_fault *fault, void *data)
> +{
> + vm_fault_t ret;
> + struct mm_struct *mm;
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + unsigned int access_flags = 0;
> + struct iommu_domain *domain = data;
> + unsigned int fault_flags = FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE;
> + struct iommu_fault_page_request *prm = &fault->prm;
> + enum iommu_page_response_code status = IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_INVALID;
> +
> + if (!(prm->flags & IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_PASID_VALID))
> + return status;
> +
> + mm = iommu_sva_domain_mm(domain);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mm) || !mmget_not_zero(mm))
> + return status;
> +
> + mmap_read_lock(mm);
> +
> + vma = find_extend_vma(mm, prm->addr);
> + if (!vma)
> + /* Unmapped area */
> + goto out_put_mm;
> +
> + if (prm->perm & IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_READ)
> + access_flags |= VM_READ;
> +
> + if (prm->perm & IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_WRITE) {
> + access_flags |= VM_WRITE;
> + fault_flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
> + }
> +
> + if (prm->perm & IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_EXEC) {
> + access_flags |= VM_EXEC;
> + fault_flags |= FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION;
> + }
> +
> + if (!(prm->perm & IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_PRIV))
> + fault_flags |= FAULT_FLAG_USER;
> +
> + if (access_flags & ~vma->vm_flags)
> + /* Access fault */
> + goto out_put_mm;
> +
> + ret = handle_mm_fault(vma, prm->addr, fault_flags, NULL);
> + status = ret & VM_FAULT_ERROR ? IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_INVALID :
> + IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_SUCCESS;
> +
> +out_put_mm:
> + mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> + mmput(mm);
> +
> + return status;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * IOMMU SVA driver-oriented interfaces
> */
> @@ -154,6 +217,8 @@ iommu_sva_alloc_domain(struct device *dev, struct iommu_sva_ioas *ioas)
> /* The caller must hold a reference to ioas. */
> domain->sva_ioas = ioas;
> domain->type = IOMMU_DOMAIN_SVA;
> + domain->iopf_handler = iommu_sva_handle_iopf;
> + domain->fault_data = domain;
>
> return domain;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index 7cae631c1baa..33449523afbe 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -3174,3 +3174,24 @@ void iommu_detach_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>
> iommu_group_put(group);
> }
> +
> +struct iommu_domain *iommu_get_domain_for_dev_pasid(struct device *dev,
> + ioasid_t pasid)
> +{
> + struct iommu_domain *domain;
> + struct iommu_group *group;
> +
> + if (!pasid_valid(pasid))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + group = iommu_group_get(dev);
> + if (!group)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&group->mutex);

Unfortunately this still causes the deadlock when unbind() flushes the
IOPF queue while holding the group mutex.

If we make this function private to IOPF, then we can get rid of this
mutex_lock(). It's OK because:

* xarray protects its internal state with RCU, so we can call
xa_load() outside the lock.

* The domain obtained from xa_load is finalized. Its content is valid
because xarray stores the domain using rcu_assign_pointer(), which has a
release memory barrier, which pairs with data dependencies in IOPF
(domain->sva_ioas etc).

We'll need to be careful about this when allowing other users to install
a fault handler. Should be fine as long as the handler and data are
installed before the domain is added to pasid_array.

* We know the domain is valid the whole time IOPF is using it, because
unbind() waits for pending faults.

We just need a comment explaining the last point, something like:

/*
* Safe to fetch outside the group mutex because:
* - xarray protects its internal state with RCU
* - the domain obtained is either NULL or fully formed
* - the IOPF work is the only caller and is flushed before the
* domain is freed.
*/

Thanks,
Jean

> + domain = xa_load(&group->pasid_array, pasid);
> + mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
> + iommu_group_put(group);
> +
> + return domain;
> +}
> --
> 2.25.1
>