From: Maximilian Heyne <mheyne@amazon.de>
To: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Maximilian Heyne <mheyne@amazon.de>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] drivers, ixgbe: show VF statistics
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 07:39:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220509073915.28476-1-mheyne@amazon.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7775a23b-199e-b0f2-fe6b-06a667ac9dee@intel.com>
On 2022-05-06T09:20:14-07:00 Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> wrote:
> On 5/6/2022 9:13 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 May 2022 06:44:40 +0000 Maximilian Heyne wrote:
> >> On 2022-05-04T20:16:32-07:00 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 3 May 2022 15:00:17 +0000 Maximilian Heyne wrote:
> >>>> + for (i = 0; i < adapter->num_vfs; i++) {
> >>>> + ethtool_sprintf(&p, "VF %u Rx Packets", i);
> >>>> + ethtool_sprintf(&p, "VF %u Rx Bytes", i);
> >>>> + ethtool_sprintf(&p, "VF %u Tx Packets", i);
> >>>> + ethtool_sprintf(&p, "VF %u Tx Bytes", i);
> >>>> + ethtool_sprintf(&p, "VF %u MC Packets", i);
> >>>> + }
> >>>
> >>> Please drop the ethtool stats. We've been trying to avoid duplicating
> >>> the same stats in ethtool and iproute2 for a while now.
> >>
> >> I can see the point that standard metrics should only be reported via the
> >> iproute2 interface. However, in this special case this patch was
> >> intended to converge the out-of-tree driver with the in-tree version.
> >> These missing stats were breaking our userspace. If we now switch
> >> solely to iproute2 based statistics both driver versions would
> >> diverge even more. So depending on where a user gets the ixgbe driver
> >> from, they have to work-around.
> >>
> >> I can change the patch as requested, but it will contradict the inital
> >> intention. At least Intel should then port this change to the
> >> external driver as well. Let's get a statement from them.
>
> We discussed this patch internally and concluded the correct approach
> would be to not have the ethtool stats and use the VF info. Jakub beat
> us to the comment. We would plan to port the iproute implementation to
> OOT as well.
Ok, then I'll send a follow-up patch without the ethtool changes. I'm happy to
get some kind of convergence between the out-of-tree driver and upstream.
While at it, I wonder whether other drivers need similar changes as well and
what other features are missing in the upstream driver. There should be no
surprises when switching between these drivers.
>
> > Ack, but we really want people to move towards using standard stats.
> >
> > Can you change the user space to first try reading the stats via
> > iproute2/rtnetlink? And fallback to random ethtool strings if not
> > available? That way it will work with any driver implementing the
> > standard API. Long term that'll make everyone's life easier.
Yes, in this case we are in control of user space and can work around.
> >
> > Out-of-tree code cannot be an argument upstream, otherwise we'd
> > completely lose control over our APIs. Vendors could ship whatever
> > in their out of tree repo and then force us to accept it upstream.
> >
> > It's disappointing to see the vendor letting the uAPI of the out of
> > tree driver diverge from upstream, especially a driver this mature.
>
Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
Krausenstr. 38
10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Christian Schlaeger, Jonathan Weiss
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg unter HRB 149173 B
Sitz: Berlin
Ust-ID: DE 289 237 879
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-09 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-03 15:00 [PATCH net-next v2] drivers, ixgbe: show VF statistics Maximilian Heyne
2022-05-05 3:16 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-06 6:44 ` Maximilian Heyne
2022-05-06 16:13 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-06 16:20 ` Tony Nguyen
2022-05-09 7:39 ` Maximilian Heyne [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220509073915.28476-1-mheyne@amazon.de \
--to=mheyne@amazon.de \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox