From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@microchip.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>,
Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next v2 4/9] net: dsa: microchip: move port memory allocation to ksz_common
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 14:12:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220516111252.rggqmaj7mxv6fieg@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220513102219.30399-5-arun.ramadoss@microchip.com>
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 03:52:14PM +0530, Arun Ramadoss wrote:
> ksz8795 and ksz9477 init function initializes the memory to dev->ports
> and assigns the ds real number of ports. Since both the routines are
> same, moved the allocation of port memory to ksz_switch_register after
> init.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@microchip.com>
> ---
Does this actually work? ksz8_switch_init() and ksz9477_switch_init()
still dereference dev->ports. They are called from dev->dev_ops->init()
from ksz_switch_register(). You have moved the devm_kzalloc() to _after_
the dev->dev_ops->init() call. So these functions are accessing memory
behind a not-yet-allocated pointer.
> drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795.c | 8 --------
> drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c | 8 --------
> drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c | 9 +++++++++
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795.c b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795.c
> index b6032b65afc2..91f29ff7256c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795.c
> @@ -1599,11 +1599,6 @@ static int ksz8_switch_init(struct ksz_device *dev)
>
> dev->reg_mib_cnt = MIB_COUNTER_NUM;
>
> - dev->ports = devm_kzalloc(dev->dev,
> - dev->info->port_cnt * sizeof(struct ksz_port),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!dev->ports)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> for (i = 0; i < dev->info->port_cnt; i++) {
> mutex_init(&dev->ports[i].mib.cnt_mutex);
> dev->ports[i].mib.counters =
> @@ -1615,9 +1610,6 @@ static int ksz8_switch_init(struct ksz_device *dev)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - /* set the real number of ports */
> - dev->ds->num_ports = dev->info->port_cnt;
> -
> /* We rely on software untagging on the CPU port, so that we
> * can support both tagged and untagged VLANs
> */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c
> index c712a0011367..1a0fd36e180e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c
> @@ -1482,11 +1482,6 @@ static int ksz9477_switch_init(struct ksz_device *dev)
> dev->reg_mib_cnt = SWITCH_COUNTER_NUM;
> dev->mib_cnt = TOTAL_SWITCH_COUNTER_NUM;
>
> - dev->ports = devm_kzalloc(dev->dev,
> - dev->info->port_cnt * sizeof(struct ksz_port),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!dev->ports)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> for (i = 0; i < dev->info->port_cnt; i++) {
> spin_lock_init(&dev->ports[i].mib.stats64_lock);
> mutex_init(&dev->ports[i].mib.cnt_mutex);
> @@ -1499,9 +1494,6 @@ static int ksz9477_switch_init(struct ksz_device *dev)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - /* set the real number of ports */
> - dev->ds->num_ports = dev->info->port_cnt;
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
> index fd2f1bd3feb5..717734fe437e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
> @@ -768,6 +768,15 @@ int ksz_switch_register(struct ksz_device *dev,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + dev->ports = devm_kzalloc(dev->dev,
> + dev->info->port_cnt * sizeof(struct ksz_port),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!dev->ports)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /* set the real number of ports */
> + dev->ds->num_ports = dev->info->port_cnt;
> +
> /* Host port interface will be self detected, or specifically set in
> * device tree.
> */
> --
> 2.33.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-16 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-13 10:22 [RFC Patch net-next v2 0/9] net: dsa: microchip: refactor the ksz switch init function Arun Ramadoss
2022-05-13 10:22 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 1/9] net: dsa: microchip: ksz8795: update the port_cnt value in ksz_chip_data Arun Ramadoss
2022-05-16 10:40 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-05-17 2:53 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-05-13 10:22 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 2/9] net: dsa: microchip: move ksz_chip_data to ksz_common Arun Ramadoss
2022-05-16 10:51 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-05-17 2:55 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-05-13 10:22 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 3/9] net: dsa: microchip: perform the compatibility check for dev probed Arun Ramadoss
2022-05-16 11:03 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-05-16 11:08 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-05-13 10:22 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 4/9] net: dsa: microchip: move port memory allocation to ksz_common Arun Ramadoss
2022-05-16 11:12 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2022-05-13 10:22 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 5/9] net: dsa: microchip: move struct mib_names to ksz_chip_data Arun Ramadoss
2022-05-16 11:23 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-05-13 10:22 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 6/9] net: dsa: microchip: move get_strings to ksz_common Arun Ramadoss
2022-05-16 11:24 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-05-17 2:56 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-05-13 10:22 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 7/9] net: dsa: move mib->cnt_ptr reset code to ksz_common.c Arun Ramadoss
2022-05-16 11:25 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-05-17 2:56 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-05-13 10:22 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 8/9] net: dsa: microchip: add the phylink get_caps Arun Ramadoss
2022-05-16 11:29 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-05-17 2:58 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-05-13 10:22 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 9/9] net: dsa: microchip: remove unused members in ksz_device Arun Ramadoss
2022-05-16 11:30 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-05-17 2:58 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220516111252.rggqmaj7mxv6fieg@skbuf \
--to=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=arun.ramadoss@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linux@rempel-privat.de \
--cc=m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
--cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox