From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: e500: Fix compilation with gcc e500 compiler
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 14:52:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220524195216.GL25951@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220524191610.hnodzz2j7mlgthey@pali>
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 09:16:10PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 May 2022 13:52:47 Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > Aha. Right, because this config forces -mspe it requires one of these
> > CPUs.
> >
> > You can use a powerpc-linux compiler instead, and everything will just
> > work. These CPUs are still supported, in all of GCC 9 .. GCC 12 :-)
>
> Ok. I can use different "generic" powerpc compiler (It should work fine
> as you said, as it has also -mcpu=8540 option). But I think that
> compilation of kernel should be supported also by that gcc 8.5.0 e500
> compiler.
That linuxspe compiler you mean. Sure, why not, the more the merrier,
as long as it doesn't get in the way of other stuff, I won't protest.
But please don't confuse people: you are talking about a
powerpc-linuxspe compiler, not e500, which is supported just fine by
current GCC trunk still, and does not have such limitations :-)
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-24 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-24 9:39 [PATCH] powerpc: e500: Fix compilation with gcc e500 compiler Pali Rohár
2022-05-24 17:59 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-05-24 18:12 ` Pali Rohár
2022-05-24 18:52 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-05-24 19:16 ` Pali Rohár
2022-05-24 19:52 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2022-07-02 9:39 ` Pali Rohár
2022-07-02 9:44 ` Pali Rohár
2022-07-04 10:23 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-07-04 10:39 ` Pali Rohár
2022-07-04 12:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-07-04 13:13 ` Pali Rohár
2022-07-04 13:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-07-04 13:29 ` Pali Rohár
2022-07-04 13:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-07-07 9:56 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-07-07 9:59 ` Pali Rohár
2022-07-08 17:14 ` Pali Rohár
2022-07-08 20:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-07-09 9:16 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-07-09 10:23 ` Pali Rohár
2022-07-10 17:38 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-07-10 17:57 ` Pali Rohár
2022-07-11 14:20 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-07-08 17:12 ` Pali Rohár
2022-07-08 20:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-07-09 8:51 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-07-09 9:26 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-07-11 16:14 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-07-11 17:32 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-07-11 21:48 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-07-12 9:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-07-12 14:11 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220524195216.GL25951@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox