Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Implement vdpasim stop operation

Jason Wang
2022-06-02T02:03:12Z

On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 3:30 AM Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > From: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 5:50 AM
> >
> > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 10:19 PM Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2022 11:39 PM
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 6:56 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 12:54:32PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2022 8:44 AM
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Implement stop operation for vdpa_sim devices, so vhost-vdpa
> > > > > > > will offer
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > that backend feature and userspace can effectively stop the device.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is a must before get virtqueue indexes (base) for live
> > > > > > > migration,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > since the device could modify them after userland gets them.
> > > > > > > There are
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > individual ways to perform that action for some devices
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > (VHOST_NET_SET_BACKEND, VHOST_VSOCK_SET_RUNNING, ...)
> > but
> > > > there
> > > > > > > was no
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > way to perform it for any vhost device (and, in particular, vhost-
> > vdpa).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > After the return of ioctl with stop != 0, the device MUST
> > > > > > > finish any
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > pending operations like in flight requests. It must also
> > > > > > > preserve all
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > the necessary state (the virtqueue vring base plus the
> > > > > > > possible device
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > specific states) that is required for restoring in the future.
> > > > > > > The
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > device must not change its configuration after that point.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > After the return of ioctl with stop == 0, the device can
> > > > > > > continue
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > processing buffers as long as typical conditions are met (vq
> > > > > > > is enabled,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > DRIVER_OK status bit is enabled, etc).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just to be clear, we are adding vdpa level new ioctl() that
> > > > > > doesn’t map to
> > > > any mechanism in the virtio spec.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why can't we use this ioctl() to indicate driver to start/stop
> > > > > > the device
> > > > instead of driving it through the driver_ok?
> > > > > > This is in the context of other discussion we had in the LM series.
> > > > >
> > > > > If there's something in the spec that does this then let's use that.
> > > >
> > > > Actually, we try to propose a independent feature here:
> > > >
> > > > https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/202111/msg00020.htm
> > > > l
> > > >
> > > This will stop the device for all the operations.
> > > Once the device is stopped, its state cannot be queried further as device
> > won't respond.
> > > It has limited use case.
> > > What we need is to stop non admin queue related portion of the device.
> > >
> >
> > Still don't follow this, sorry.
> Once a device it stopped its state etc cannot be queried.

This is not what is proposed here.

> if you want to stop and still allow certain operations, a better spec definition is needed that says,
>
> stop A, B, C, but allow D, E, F, G.
> A = stop CVQs and save its state somewhere
> B = stop data VQs and save it state somewhere
> C = stop generic config interrupt

Actually, it's the stop of the config space change.
And what more, any guest visible state must not be changed.

>
> D = query state of multiple VQs
> E = query device statistics and other elements/objects in future

This is the device state I believe.

> F = setup/config/restore certain fields

This is the reverse of D and E, that is setting the state.

> G = resume the device
>

Thanks

> >
> > Adding the admin vq to the mix, this would stop a device of a device group,
> > but not the whole virtqueue group. If the admin VQ is offered by the PF
> > (since it's not exposed to the guest), it will continue accepting requests as
> > normal. If it's exposed in the VF, I think the best bet is to shadow it, since
> > guest and host requests could conflict.
> >
> > Since this is offered through vdpa, the device backend driver can route it to
> > whatever method works better for the hardware. For example, to send an
> > admin vq command to the PF. That's why it's important to keep the feature
> > as self-contained and orthogonal to others as possible.
> >
>
> I replied in other thread to continue there.