[RESEND RFC 05/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Fix confusing docs for drm_dp_atomic_release_time_slots()

Lyude Paul
2022-06-08T01:08:53Z

For some reason we mention returning 0 if "slots have been added back to
drm_dp_mst_topology_state->avail_slots". This is totally misleading,
avail_slots is simply for figuring out the total number of slots available
in total on the topology and has no relation to the current payload
allocations.

So, let's get rid of that comment.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index 702ff5d9ecc7..ec52f91b1f0e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -4467,8 +4467,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots);
* drm_dp_mst_atomic_check()
*
* Returns:
- * 0 if all slots for this port were added back to
- * &drm_dp_mst_topology_state.avail_slots or negative error code
+ * 0 on success, negative error code otherwise
*/
int drm_dp_atomic_release_time_slots(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
--
2.35.3