public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Francis Laniel <flaniel@linux.microsoft.com>
To: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Daniel Kiss <daniel.kiss@arm.com>,
	Francis Laniel <flaniel@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/1] Remove forget_syscall() from start_thread_common()
Date: Wed,  8 Jun 2022 17:24:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220608162447.666494-1-flaniel@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)

Hi.


First, I hope you are fine and the same for your relatives.

With this contribution, I enabled using syscalls:sys_exit_execve and
syscalls:sys_exit_execveat as tracepoints on arm64.
Indeed, before this contribution, the above tracepoint would not print their
information as syscall number was set to -1 by calling forget_syscall().

I tested it by compiling a kernel for arm64 and running it within a VM:
# Perf was compiled with linux kernel source.
root@vm-arm64:~# perf record -ag -e 'syscalls:sys_exit_execve' -e 'syscalls:sys_enter_execve' &
[1] 263
root@vm-arm64:~# ls
perf.data  share
root@vm-arm64:~# fg
perf record -ag -e 'syscalls:sys_exit_execve' -e 'syscalls:sys_enter_execve'
^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.061 MB perf.data (2 samples) ]
root@vm-arm64:~# perf script
bash   264 [000]    66.220187: syscalls:sys_enter_execve: filename: 0xaaab05d9d
...
# Below line does not appear without this patch.
ls   264 [000]    66.226848:  syscalls:sys_exit_execve: 0x0
...

Forgetting the syscall number before starting a new thread was confirmed to be
a bug [1].
Particularly, the following architectures do not forget the syscall number
before starting a new thread:
* arm (32 bits) EABI: start_thread() sets r7 to previous r7 for ELF FDPIC  and
to 0 for other binfmts [2].
* arm (32 bits) OABI: syscall number is set to -1 if
ptrace_report_syscall_entry() failed [3].
* mips: start_thread() does not modify current_thread_info->syscall which is
taken directly from v0 [4, 5].
* riscv: start_thread() does not modify a7 [6].
* x86_64: start_thread_common() does not touch orig_ax which seems to contain
the syscall number [7].

If you see any way to improve this contribution, feel free to share!

Change since:
v1:
 * Remove call to forget_syscall() and store previous syscall number in
 regs->syscallno unconditionnaly.

Francis Laniel (1):
  arm64: Do not forget syscall when starting a new thread.

 arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


Best regards and thank you in advance.
---
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/YoT1iLPEbteRTQGZ@arm.com/
[2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.18-rc6/source/arch/arm/include/asm/
processor.h#L52
[3] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.18-rc6/source/arch/arm/kernel/
ptrace.c#L847
[4] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.18-rc6/source/arch/mips/kernel/
process.c#L52
[5] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.18-rc6/source/arch/mips/kernel/
scall64-n64.S#L85
[6] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.18-rc6/source/arch/riscv/kernel/
process.c#L87
[7] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.18-rc6/source/arch/x86/kernel/
process_64.c#L505
-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-06-08 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-08 16:24 Francis Laniel [this message]
2022-06-08 16:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: Do not forget syscall when starting a new thread Francis Laniel
2022-06-28 13:58   ` Will Deacon
2022-06-28 19:26     ` Francis Laniel
2022-06-30 17:16       ` Francis Laniel
2022-07-01 11:36         ` Will Deacon
2022-07-01 12:10           ` Francis Laniel
2022-06-23 14:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] Remove forget_syscall() from start_thread_common() Francis Laniel
2022-07-01 15:41 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-04  8:55   ` Francis Laniel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220608162447.666494-1-flaniel@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=flaniel@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=daniel.kiss@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=pcc@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox