From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
To: bleung@chromium.org, groeck@chromium.org
Cc: chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, tzungbi@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 15/21] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: add Kunit test for getting cmd mask error
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 08:49:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220609084957.3684698-16-tzungbi@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220609084957.3684698-1-tzungbi@kernel.org>
cros_ec_query_all() uses cros_ec_get_host_command_version_mask() to
query the supported MKBP version; cros_ec_get_host_command_version_mask()
uses send_command() for transferring the host command.
Returning >=0 from send_command() only denotes the transfer was success.
cros_ec_get_host_command_version_mask() should check if EC wasn't happy
by checking `msg->result`.
Add a Kunit test for returning error in `msg->result` in
cros_ec_get_host_command_version_mask(). For the case,
cros_ec_query_all() should find the EC device doesn't support MKBP.
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
---
Changes from v3:
- Add R-b tag.
- Fix typo s/transfering/transferring/.
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 89 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c
index 63071af81c94..ce7a2f64f01b 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c
@@ -892,6 +892,94 @@ static void cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_no_mkbp(struct kunit *test)
}
}
+static void cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_no_mkbp_return_error(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct cros_ec_proto_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
+ struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev = &priv->ec_dev;
+ struct ec_xfer_mock *mock;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Set some garbage bytes. */
+ ec_dev->mkbp_event_supported = 0xbf;
+
+ /* For cros_ec_get_proto_info() without passthru. */
+ {
+ struct ec_response_get_protocol_info *data;
+
+ mock = cros_kunit_ec_xfer_mock_add(test, sizeof(*data));
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, mock, NULL);
+
+ /*
+ * Although it doesn't check the value, provides valid sizes so that
+ * cros_ec_query_all() allocates din and dout correctly.
+ */
+ data = (struct ec_response_get_protocol_info *)mock->o_data;
+ data->max_request_packet_size = 0xbe;
+ data->max_response_packet_size = 0xef;
+ }
+
+ /* For cros_ec_get_proto_info() with passthru. */
+ {
+ mock = cros_kunit_ec_xfer_mock_addx(test, 0, EC_RES_INVALID_COMMAND, 0);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, mock, NULL);
+ }
+
+ /* For cros_ec_get_host_command_version_mask() for MKBP. */
+ {
+ mock = cros_kunit_ec_xfer_mock_addx(test, 0, EC_RES_INVALID_COMMAND, 0);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, mock, NULL);
+ }
+
+ cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_pretest(test);
+ ret = cros_ec_query_all(ec_dev);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ /* For cros_ec_get_proto_info() without passthru. */
+ {
+ mock = cros_kunit_ec_xfer_mock_next();
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_NE(test, mock, NULL);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.version, 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.command, EC_CMD_GET_PROTOCOL_INFO);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.insize,
+ sizeof(struct ec_response_get_protocol_info));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.outsize, 0);
+ }
+
+ /* For cros_ec_get_proto_info() with passthru. */
+ {
+ mock = cros_kunit_ec_xfer_mock_next();
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_NE(test, mock, NULL);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.version, 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.command,
+ EC_CMD_PASSTHRU_OFFSET(CROS_EC_DEV_PD_INDEX) |
+ EC_CMD_GET_PROTOCOL_INFO);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.insize,
+ sizeof(struct ec_response_get_protocol_info));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.outsize, 0);
+ }
+
+ /* For cros_ec_get_host_command_version_mask() for MKBP. */
+ {
+ struct ec_params_get_cmd_versions *data;
+
+ mock = cros_kunit_ec_xfer_mock_next();
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_NE(test, mock, NULL);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.version, 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.command, EC_CMD_GET_CMD_VERSIONS);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.insize,
+ sizeof(struct ec_response_get_cmd_versions));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.outsize, sizeof(*data));
+
+ data = (struct ec_params_get_cmd_versions *)mock->i_data;
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, data->cmd, EC_CMD_GET_NEXT_EVENT);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ec_dev->mkbp_event_supported, 0);
+ }
+}
+
static void cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_no_host_sleep(struct kunit *test)
{
struct cros_ec_proto_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
@@ -1185,6 +1273,7 @@ static struct kunit_case cros_ec_proto_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_legacy_data_error),
KUNIT_CASE(cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_legacy_return0),
KUNIT_CASE(cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_no_mkbp),
+ KUNIT_CASE(cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_no_mkbp_return_error),
KUNIT_CASE(cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_no_host_sleep),
KUNIT_CASE(cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_default_wake_mask_return_error),
{}
--
2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-09 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-09 8:49 [PATCH v4 00/21] platform/chrome: Kunit tests and refactor for cros_ec_query_all() Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v4 01/21] platform/chrome: cros_ec_commands: fix compile errors Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v4 02/21] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: add Kunit tests for cros_ec_query_all() Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v4 03/21] platform/chrome: use macros for passthru indexes Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v4 04/21] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: assign buffer size from protocol info Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v4 05/21] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: remove redundant NULL check Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v4 06/21] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: use cros_ec_map_error() Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v4 07/21] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: separate cros_ec_get_proto_info() Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v4 08/21] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: add Kunit tests for getting proto info Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v4 09/21] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: handle empty payload in " Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v4 10/21] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: separate cros_ec_get_proto_info_legacy() Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v4 11/21] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: add Kunit test for getting legacy info Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v4 12/21] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: handle empty payload in getting info legacy Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v4 13/21] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: don't show MKBP version if unsupported Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v4 14/21] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: return 0 on getting cmd mask success Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-09 8:49 ` Tzung-Bi Shih [this message]
2022-06-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v4 16/21] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: check `msg->result` in getting cmd mask Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v4 17/21] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: add Kunit tests for " Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v4 18/21] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: handle empty payload in " Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v4 19/21] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: return 0 on getting wake mask success Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v4 20/21] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: add Kunit test for getting wake mask Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v4 21/21] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: handle empty payload in " Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-10 2:40 ` [PATCH v4 00/21] platform/chrome: Kunit tests and refactor for cros_ec_query_all() patchwork-bot+chrome-platform
2022-06-10 4:40 ` patchwork-bot+chrome-platform
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220609084957.3684698-16-tzungbi@kernel.org \
--to=tzungbi@kernel.org \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox