From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, david@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, seanjc@google.com,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/3] x86/tdx: Handle load_unaligned_zeropad() page-cross to a shared page
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 20:10:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220615171042.oeumb3vs3ttu4rvd@black.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <051fd468-11e6-308b-66c8-4de16ff80deb@intel.com>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 08:27:52AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 6/14/22 05:01, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > load_unaligned_zeropad() can lead to unwanted loads across page boundaries.
> > The unwanted loads are typically harmless. But, they might be made to
> > totally unrelated or even unmapped memory. load_unaligned_zeropad()
> > relies on exception fixup (#PF, #GP and now #VE) to recover from these
> > unwanted loads.
> >
> > In TDX guests, the second page can be shared page and VMM may configure
> > it to trigger #VE.
> >
> > Kernel assumes that #VE on a shared page is MMIO access and tries to
> > decode instruction to handle it. In case of load_unaligned_zeropad() it
> > may result in confusion as it is not MMIO access.
> >
> > Fix it by detecting split page MMIO accesses and fail them.
> > load_unaligned_zeropad() will recover using exception fixups.
> >
> > The issue was discovered by analysis. It was not triggered during the
> > testing.
>
> I thought this whole exercise was kicked off by hitting this in testing.
> Am I remembering this wrong?
>
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220517153444.11195-10-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com/
>
> Says:
>
> > This is an actual, real-world problem which was discovered during TDX
> > testing.
>
> Or were you considering this a different problem somehow?
They are different.
The patch by the link addresses issue of load_unaligned_zeropad() stepping
onto unaccepted memory. This was triggered in practice.
This patch address stepping onto MMIO shared memory. I had to force the
situation manually as MMIO memory mapped with ioremap() and it is not next
to normally allocated memory used by load_unaligned_zeropad() (such as
dentry cache).
Although any shared memory (SWIOTLB buffer for instance) can generate EPT
violation #VE if the VMM is malicious enough.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-15 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-14 12:01 [PATCHv4 0/3] An updated version of the load_unaligned_zeropad() fix Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-14 12:01 ` [PATCHv4 1/3] x86/tdx: Fix early #VE handling Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-17 21:53 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-14 12:01 ` [PATCHv4 2/3] x86/tdx: Clarify RIP adjustments in #VE handler Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-17 21:53 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-14 12:01 ` [PATCHv4 3/3] x86/tdx: Handle load_unaligned_zeropad() page-cross to a shared page Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-15 15:27 ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-15 17:10 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2022-06-15 21:55 ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-15 22:43 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-15 22:49 ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-15 23:16 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-15 18:12 ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-15 22:32 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-15 22:36 ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-15 23:16 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-15 22:52 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-15 23:34 ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-16 1:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-16 6:35 ` David Laight
2022-06-17 21:53 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-17 22:41 ` tip-bot2 for Kirill A. Shutemov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220615171042.oeumb3vs3ttu4rvd@black.fi.intel.com \
--to=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox