public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "José Expósito" <jose.exposito89@gmail.com>
To: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: tool: Enable virtio/PCI by default on UML
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 08:53:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220627065304.GA43016@elementary> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220624084400.1454579-1-davidgow@google.com>

On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 04:43:59PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> There are several tests which depend on PCI, and hence need a bunch of
> extra options to run under UML. This makes it awkward to give
> configuration instructions (whether in documentation, or as part of a
> .kunitconfig file), as two separate, incompatible sets of config options
> are required for UML and "most other architectures".
> 
> For non-UML architectures, it's possible to add default kconfig options
> via the qemu_config python files, but there's no equivalent for UML. Add
> a new tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config file containing extra
> kconfig options to use on UML.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>

Tested-by: José Expósito <jose.exposito89@gmail.com>

After applying this patch and its dependencies, I can confirm that it is
possible to run the DRM tests with the following command:

$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=drivers/gpu/drm/tests

Added a TODO for myself to remove the extra flag from the DRM docs once
this patch is merged.

Thanks a lot for making it easier!

Jose

> ---
> 
> NOTE: This has dependencies on the 'make --kunitconfig repeatable'
> series:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220624001247.3255978-1-dlatypov@google.com/
> which, in turn, depends on:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220520224200.3764027-1-dlatypov@google.com/
> Please apply those first.
> 
> Changes since RFC:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220622035326.759935-1-davidgow@google.com/
> - Rebase on top of the previous kconfig patches.
> - Fix a missing make_arch_qemuconfig->make_arch_config rename (Thanks
>   Brendan)
> - Fix the tests to use the base LinuxSourceTreeOperations class, which
>   has no default kconfig options (and so won't conflict with those set
>   in the tests). Only test_build_reconfig_existing_config actually
>   failed, but I updated a few more in case the defaults changed.
> 
> 
> ---
>  tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config |  5 +++++
>  tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py         | 14 ++++++++++----
>  tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py      | 12 ++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config b/tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e824ce43b05a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config
> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> +# Config options which are added to UML builds by default
> +
> +# Enable virtio/pci, as a lot of tests require it.
> +CONFIG_VIRTIO_UML=y
> +CONFIG_UML_PCI_OVER_VIRTIO=y
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
> index fc415ff7530e..127598fb994b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ KUNITCONFIG_PATH = '.kunitconfig'
>  OLD_KUNITCONFIG_PATH = 'last_used_kunitconfig'
>  DEFAULT_KUNITCONFIG_PATH = 'tools/testing/kunit/configs/default.config'
>  BROKEN_ALLCONFIG_PATH = 'tools/testing/kunit/configs/broken_on_uml.config'
> +UML_KCONFIG_PATH = 'tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config'
>  OUTFILE_PATH = 'test.log'
>  ABS_TOOL_PATH = os.path.abspath(os.path.dirname(__file__))
>  QEMU_CONFIGS_DIR = os.path.join(ABS_TOOL_PATH, 'qemu_configs')
> @@ -53,7 +54,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeOperations:
>  		except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
>  			raise ConfigError(e.output.decode())
>  
> -	def make_arch_qemuconfig(self, base_kunitconfig: kunit_config.Kconfig) -> kunit_config.Kconfig:
> +	def make_arch_config(self, base_kunitconfig: kunit_config.Kconfig) -> kunit_config.Kconfig:
>  		return base_kunitconfig
>  
>  	def make_allyesconfig(self, build_dir: str, make_options) -> None:
> @@ -109,7 +110,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeOperationsQemu(LinuxSourceTreeOperations):
>  		self._kernel_command_line = qemu_arch_params.kernel_command_line + ' kunit_shutdown=reboot'
>  		self._extra_qemu_params = qemu_arch_params.extra_qemu_params
>  
> -	def make_arch_qemuconfig(self, base_kunitconfig: kunit_config.Kconfig) -> kunit_config.Kconfig:
> +	def make_arch_config(self, base_kunitconfig: kunit_config.Kconfig) -> kunit_config.Kconfig:
>  		kconfig = kunit_config.parse_from_string(self._kconfig)
>  		kconfig.merge_in_entries(base_kunitconfig)
>  		return kconfig
> @@ -138,6 +139,11 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml(LinuxSourceTreeOperations):
>  	def __init__(self, cross_compile=None):
>  		super().__init__(linux_arch='um', cross_compile=cross_compile)
>  
> +	def make_arch_config(self, base_kunitconfig: kunit_config.Kconfig) -> kunit_config.Kconfig:
> +		kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(UML_KCONFIG_PATH)
> +		kconfig.merge_in_entries(base_kunitconfig)
> +		return kconfig
> +
>  	def make_allyesconfig(self, build_dir: str, make_options) -> None:
>  		kunit_parser.print_with_timestamp(
>  			'Enabling all CONFIGs for UML...')
> @@ -297,7 +303,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTree:
>  		if build_dir and not os.path.exists(build_dir):
>  			os.mkdir(build_dir)
>  		try:
> -			self._kconfig = self._ops.make_arch_qemuconfig(self._kconfig)
> +			self._kconfig = self._ops.make_arch_config(self._kconfig)
>  			self._kconfig.write_to_file(kconfig_path)
>  			self._ops.make_olddefconfig(build_dir, make_options)
>  		except ConfigError as e:
> @@ -328,7 +334,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTree:
>  			return self.build_config(build_dir, make_options)
>  
>  		existing_kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(kconfig_path)
> -		self._kconfig = self._ops.make_arch_qemuconfig(self._kconfig)
> +		self._kconfig = self._ops.make_arch_config(self._kconfig)
>  
>  		if self._kconfig.is_subset_of(existing_kconfig) and not self._kunitconfig_changed(build_dir):
>  			return True
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> index e21ae1331350..08cb2dc8ef7d 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> @@ -430,6 +430,10 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase):
>  				f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y')
>  
>  			tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir)
> +			# Stub out the source tree operations, so we don't have
> +			# the defaults for any given architecture get in the
> +			# way.
> +			tree._ops = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTreeOperations(None, None)
>  			mock_build_config = mock.patch.object(tree, 'build_config').start()
>  
>  			# Should generate the .config
> @@ -447,6 +451,10 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase):
>  				f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y\nCONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y')
>  
>  			tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir)
> +			# Stub out the source tree operations, so we don't have
> +			# the defaults for any given architecture get in the
> +			# way.
> +			tree._ops = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTreeOperations(None, None)
>  			mock_build_config = mock.patch.object(tree, 'build_config').start()
>  
>  			self.assertTrue(tree.build_reconfig(build_dir, make_options=[]))
> @@ -463,6 +471,10 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase):
>  				f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y\nCONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y')
>  
>  			tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir)
> +			# Stub out the source tree operations, so we don't have
> +			# the defaults for any given architecture get in the
> +			# way.
> +			tree._ops = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTreeOperations(None, None)
>  			mock_build_config = mock.patch.object(tree, 'build_config').start()
>  
>  			# ... so we should trigger a call to build_config()
> -- 
> 2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-27  6:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-24  8:43 [PATCH] kunit: tool: Enable virtio/PCI by default on UML David Gow
2022-06-27  6:53 ` José Expósito [this message]
2022-06-27 22:57 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-06-27 23:33   ` Daniel Latypov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220627065304.GA43016@elementary \
    --to=jose.exposito89@gmail.com \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=dlatypov@google.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox