From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, ebiederm@xmission.com
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
"Kalle Valo" <kvalo@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: [PATCH] signal: break out of wait loops on kthread_stop()
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:00:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220627120020.608117-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> (raw)
I was recently surprised to learn that msleep_interruptible(),
wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(), and related functions
simply hung when I called kthread_stop() on kthreads using them. The
solution to fixing the case with msleep_interruptible() was more simply
to move to schedule_timeout_interruptible(). Why?
The reason is that msleep_interruptible(), and many functions just like
it, has a loop like this:
while (timeout && !signal_pending(current))
timeout = schedule_timeout_interruptible(timeout);
The call to kthread_stop() woke up the thread, so schedule_timeout_
interruptible() returned early, but because signal_pending() returned
true, it went back into another timeout, which was never woken up.
This wait loop pattern is common to various pieces of code, and I
suspect that subtle misuse in a kthread that caused a deadlock in the
code I looked at last week is also found elsewhere.
So this commit causes signal_pending() to return true when
kthread_stop() is called. This is already what's done for
TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL, for these same purposes of breaking out of wait
loops, so a similar KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP check isn't too much different.
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
---
include/linux/kthread.h | 1 +
include/linux/sched/signal.h | 9 +++++++++
kernel/kthread.c | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/kthread.h b/include/linux/kthread.h
index 30e5bec81d2b..7061dde23237 100644
--- a/include/linux/kthread.h
+++ b/include/linux/kthread.h
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ void kthread_bind(struct task_struct *k, unsigned int cpu);
void kthread_bind_mask(struct task_struct *k, const struct cpumask *mask);
int kthread_stop(struct task_struct *k);
bool kthread_should_stop(void);
+bool __kthread_should_stop(struct task_struct *k);
bool kthread_should_park(void);
bool __kthread_should_park(struct task_struct *k);
bool kthread_freezable_should_stop(bool *was_frozen);
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/signal.h b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
index cafbe03eed01..08700c65b806 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/signal.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <linux/refcount.h>
#include <linux/posix-timers.h>
#include <linux/mm_types.h>
+#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
/*
@@ -397,6 +398,14 @@ static inline int signal_pending(struct task_struct *p)
*/
if (unlikely(test_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)))
return 1;
+
+ /*
+ * Likewise, KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP isn't really a signal, but it also
+ * requires the same behavior, lest wait loops go forever.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(__kthread_should_stop(p)))
+ return 1;
+
return task_sigpending(p);
}
diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
index 3c677918d8f2..7e0743330cd4 100644
--- a/kernel/kthread.c
+++ b/kernel/kthread.c
@@ -145,6 +145,12 @@ void free_kthread_struct(struct task_struct *k)
kfree(kthread);
}
+bool __kthread_should_stop(struct task_struct *k)
+{
+ return (k->flags & PF_KTHREAD) &&
+ test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &to_kthread(k)->flags);
+}
+
/**
* kthread_should_stop - should this kthread return now?
*
--
2.35.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-06-27 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-27 12:00 Jason A. Donenfeld [this message]
2022-06-27 13:27 ` [PATCH] signal: break out of wait loops on kthread_stop() Peter Zijlstra
2022-06-27 14:54 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-27 14:57 ` [PATCH v2] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-27 19:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-06-28 15:59 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-28 16:14 ` [PATCH v3] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-04 12:22 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-11 17:53 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-11 18:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-07-11 20:18 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-11 20:21 ` [PATCH v4] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-11 22:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-07-11 23:21 ` [PATCH v5] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-12 0:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-07-12 0:18 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-11 22:04 ` [PATCH v3] " Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220627120020.608117-1-Jason@zx2c4.com \
--to=jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox