From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9CDC43334 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 08:09:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229989AbiGFIJV (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2022 04:09:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50786 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229592AbiGFIJS (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2022 04:09:18 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F41617A8E; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 01:09:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 189526732D; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 10:09:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 10:09:12 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Bagas Sanjaya Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Ming Lei , Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: unable to read RDB block due to b9684a71fca793 Message-ID: <20220706080912.GA32273@lst.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 09:53:36AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > Hi, > > I first noticed this issue on v5.18.9, and still found on v5.19-rc5. > > Looking at dmesg, I see error message on loop8 device: > > [ 41.319699] Dev loop8: unable to read RDB block 8 > [ 41.320566] loop8: unable to read partition table > [ 41.320597] loop8: partition table beyond EOD, truncated > > My Debian 11 laptop is also run LXD (as development server). > > Bisecting between v5.18 and v5.19-rc5, the culprit is commit b9684a71fca793 > ("block, loop: support partitions without scanning"). Which just restores the previous behavior of optionally allowing to scan for partitions on all loop devices. So that error had been there before and just disappeared due to a regression.