From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Add shadow mask for effective host MTRR memtype
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 23:00:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220715230016.3762909-4-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220715230016.3762909-1-seanjc@google.com>
Add shadow_memtype_mask to capture that EPT needs a non-zero memtype mask
instead of relying on TDP being enabled, as NPT doesn't need a non-zero
mask. This is a glorified nop as kvm_x86_ops.get_mt_mask() returns zero
for NPT anyways.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
index fb1f17504138..7314d27d57a4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ u64 __read_mostly shadow_mmio_value;
u64 __read_mostly shadow_mmio_mask;
u64 __read_mostly shadow_mmio_access_mask;
u64 __read_mostly shadow_present_mask;
+u64 __read_mostly shadow_memtype_mask;
u64 __read_mostly shadow_me_value;
u64 __read_mostly shadow_me_mask;
u64 __read_mostly shadow_acc_track_mask;
@@ -161,10 +162,10 @@ bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
if (level > PG_LEVEL_4K)
spte |= PT_PAGE_SIZE_MASK;
- if (tdp_enabled)
+
+ if (shadow_memtype_mask)
spte |= static_call(kvm_x86_get_mt_mask)(vcpu, gfn,
- kvm_is_mmio_pfn(pfn));
-
+ kvm_is_mmio_pfn(pfn));
if (host_writable)
spte |= shadow_host_writable_mask;
else
@@ -391,6 +392,13 @@ void kvm_mmu_set_ept_masks(bool has_ad_bits, bool has_exec_only)
shadow_nx_mask = 0ull;
shadow_x_mask = VMX_EPT_EXECUTABLE_MASK;
shadow_present_mask = has_exec_only ? 0ull : VMX_EPT_READABLE_MASK;
+ /*
+ * EPT overrides the host MTRRs, and so KVM must program the desired
+ * memtype directly into the SPTEs. Note, this mask is just the mask
+ * of all bits that factor into the memtype, the actual memtype must be
+ * dynamically calculated, e.g. to ensure host MMIO is mapped UC.
+ */
+ shadow_memtype_mask = VMX_EPT_MT_MASK | VMX_EPT_IPAT_BIT;
shadow_acc_track_mask = VMX_EPT_RWX_MASK;
shadow_host_writable_mask = EPT_SPTE_HOST_WRITABLE;
shadow_mmu_writable_mask = EPT_SPTE_MMU_WRITABLE;
@@ -441,6 +449,13 @@ void kvm_mmu_reset_all_pte_masks(void)
shadow_nx_mask = PT64_NX_MASK;
shadow_x_mask = 0;
shadow_present_mask = PT_PRESENT_MASK;
+
+ /*
+ * For shadow paging and NPT, KVM uses PAT entry '0' to encode WB
+ * memtype in the SPTEs, i.e. relies on host MTRRs to provide the
+ * correct memtype (WB is the "weakest" memtype).
+ */
+ shadow_memtype_mask = 0;
shadow_acc_track_mask = 0;
shadow_me_mask = 0;
shadow_me_value = 0;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
index ba3dccb202bc..cabe3fbb4f39 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
@@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_mmio_value;
extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_mmio_mask;
extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_mmio_access_mask;
extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_present_mask;
+extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_memtype_mask;
extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_me_value;
extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_me_mask;
--
2.37.0.170.g444d1eabd0-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-15 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-15 23:00 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Memtype related cleanups Sean Christopherson
2022-07-15 23:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: Reject loading KVM if host.PAT[0] != WB Sean Christopherson
2022-07-15 23:06 ` Jim Mattson
2022-07-15 23:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-18 9:42 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-15 23:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86: Drop unnecessary goto+label in kvm_arch_init() Sean Christopherson
2022-07-18 10:03 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-18 15:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-15 23:00 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-07-18 12:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Add shadow mask for effective host MTRR memtype Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-18 16:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-15 23:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Restrict mapping level based on guest MTRR iff they're used Sean Christopherson
2022-07-18 12:08 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-19 17:59 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Memtype related cleanups Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220715230016.3762909-4-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox