From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: qca8k: code split for qca8k
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 21:15:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220718181559.lzzrrutmr2b7mpsn@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62d59b1a.1c69fb81.a5458.8e4e@mx.google.com>
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 07:23:35PM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote:
> Ok, so I have to keep the qca8k special function. Is it a problem if I
> keep the function and than later make the conversion when we have the
> regmap dependency merged?
You mean to ask whether there's any problem if the common qca8k_fdb_read()
calls the specific qca8k_bulk_read as opposed to regmap_bulk_read()?
Well, no, considering that you don't yet support the switch with the
MMIO regmap, the common code is still "common" for the single switch
that the driver supports. You should be able to continue making progress
with qca8k_bulk_read() being called from common code (as long as you
leave a TODO comment or something, that it doesn't really belong there).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-18 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-16 17:49 [net-next RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: qca8k: code split for qca8k Christian Marangi
2022-07-16 17:49 ` [net-next RFC PATCH 1/4] net: dsa: qca8k: drop qca8k_read/write/rmw for regmap variant Christian Marangi
2022-07-18 18:04 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-18 17:55 ` Christian Marangi
2022-07-18 18:40 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-18 18:40 ` Christian Marangi
2022-07-18 19:35 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-18 19:30 ` Christian Marangi
2022-07-18 20:30 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-18 21:54 ` Christian Marangi
2022-07-18 23:43 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-18 23:32 ` Christian Marangi
2022-07-19 0:18 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-19 0:17 ` Christian Marangi
2022-07-19 0:41 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-16 17:49 ` [net-next RFC PATCH 2/4] net: dsa: qca8k: convert to regmap read/write API Christian Marangi
2022-07-16 17:49 ` [net-next RFC PATCH 3/4] net: dsa: qca8k: rework mib autocast handling Christian Marangi
2022-07-18 17:27 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-18 17:20 ` Christian Marangi
2022-07-18 17:58 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-16 17:49 ` [net-next RFC PATCH 4/4] net: dsa: qca8k: split qca8k in common and 8xxx specific code Christian Marangi
2022-07-18 17:21 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-18 17:10 ` Christian Marangi
2022-07-18 17:38 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-18 14:46 ` [net-next RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: qca8k: code split for qca8k Christian Marangi
2022-07-18 17:35 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-18 17:23 ` Christian Marangi
2022-07-18 18:15 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2022-07-18 18:02 ` Christian Marangi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220718181559.lzzrrutmr2b7mpsn@skbuf \
--to=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox