Re: [PATCH 00/17] nolibc: add preliminary self tests

Willy Tarreau
2022-07-20T17:14:47Z

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 12:05:14AM +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> > But again, I'm open to better proposals. I reached the limits of my
> > imagination there, but I do value the ability to "yyp" one line, change
> > two arguments and gain one extra test for a different combination, and
> > I really do not want to lose that simplicity. Note that for more complex
> > tests, it's trivial to add a dedicated function and that's what was done
> > for getdents64() which also serves as an example.
>
> OK, I understand the reason behind this now. I and Fernanda will try
> to visit this again at around 5.20-rc. *If* we can find a better
> design that matches your requirements, we will send you an RFC to
> improve it too.

You would be very welcome, thank you!

Willy