public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>,
	Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>,
	Martin Oliveira <Martin.Oliveira@eideticom.com>,
	David Sloan <David.Sloan@eideticom.com>,
	Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
	Martin Oliveira <martin.oliveira@eideticom.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] md/raid5: Drop unnecessary call to r5c_check_stripe_cache_usage()
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 15:05:58 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220727210600.120221-4-logang@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220727210600.120221-1-logang@deltatee.com>

Now that raid5_get_active_stripe() has been refactored it is appearant
that r5c_check_stripe_cache_usage() doesn't need to be called in
the wait_for_stripe branch.

r5c_check_stripe_cache_usage() will only conditionally call
r5l_wake_reclaim(), but that function is called two lines later.

Drop the call for cleanup.

Reported-by: Martin Oliveira <martin.oliveira@eideticom.com>
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
---
 drivers/md/raid5.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index e7e02a979670..e09fa55960cc 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -810,7 +810,6 @@ raid5_get_active_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, sector_t sector,
 	if (noblock)
 		goto out;
 
-	r5c_check_stripe_cache_usage(conf);
 	set_bit(R5_INACTIVE_BLOCKED, &conf->cache_state);
 	r5l_wake_reclaim(conf->log, 0);
 	wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_for_stripe,
-- 
2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-27 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-27 21:05 [PATCH 0/5] Bug fix for recent batching change Logan Gunthorpe
2022-07-27 21:05 ` [PATCH 1/5] md/raid5: Refactor raid5_get_active_stripe() Logan Gunthorpe
2022-07-28 14:13   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-29 22:48     ` Song Liu
2022-08-01 11:47       ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-08-01 16:49         ` Song Liu
2022-08-01 17:15           ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-01 20:50             ` Song Liu
2022-07-27 21:05 ` [PATCH 2/5] md/raid5: Make is_inactive_blocked() helper Logan Gunthorpe
2022-07-28 14:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-27 21:05 ` Logan Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-07-27 21:05 ` [PATCH 4/5] md/raid5: Move stripe_request_ctx up Logan Gunthorpe
2022-07-27 21:06 ` [PATCH 5/5] md/raid5: Ensure batch_last is released before sleeping for quiesce Logan Gunthorpe
2022-07-28 14:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-28  5:55 ` [PATCH 0/5] Bug fix for recent batching change Song Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220727210600.120221-4-logang@deltatee.com \
    --to=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=David.Sloan@eideticom.com \
    --cc=Martin.Oliveira@eideticom.com \
    --cc=guoqing.jiang@linux.dev \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sbates@raithlin.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox