From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 05/15] bpf: Verifer, adjust_scalar_min_max_vals to always call update_reg_bounds()
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 20:00:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220809175510.492285257@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220809175510.312431319@linuxfoundation.org>
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
commit 294f2fc6da27620a506e6c050241655459ccd6bd upstream.
Currently, for all op verification we call __red_deduce_bounds() and
__red_bound_offset() but we only call __update_reg_bounds() in bitwise
ops. However, we could benefit from calling __update_reg_bounds() in
BPF_ADD, BPF_SUB, and BPF_MUL cases as well.
For example, a register with state 'R1_w=invP0' when we subtract from
it,
w1 -= 2
Before coerce we will now have an smin_value=S64_MIN, smax_value=U64_MAX
and unsigned bounds umin_value=0, umax_value=U64_MAX. These will then
be clamped to S32_MIN, U32_MAX values by coerce in the case of alu32 op
as done in above example. However tnum will be a constant because the
ALU op is done on a constant.
Without update_reg_bounds() we have a scenario where tnum is a const
but our unsigned bounds do not reflect this. By calling update_reg_bounds
after coerce to 32bit we further refine the umin_value to U64_MAX in the
alu64 case or U32_MAX in the alu32 case above.
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158507151689.15666.566796274289413203.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5083,6 +5083,7 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(st
coerce_reg_to_size(dst_reg, 4);
}
+ __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg);
__reg_deduce_bounds(dst_reg);
__reg_bound_offset(dst_reg);
return 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-09 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-09 18:00 [PATCH 5.4 00/15] 5.4.210-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-09 18:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 01/15] thermal: Fix NULL pointer dereferences in of_thermal_ functions Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-09 18:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 02/15] ACPI: video: Force backlight native for some TongFang devices Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-09 18:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 03/15] ACPI: video: Shortening quirk list by identifying Clevo by board_name only Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-09 18:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 04/15] ACPI: APEI: Better fix to avoid spamming the console with old error logs Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-09 18:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2022-08-09 18:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 06/15] selftests/bpf: Extend verifier and bpf_sock tests for dst_port loads Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-09 18:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 07/15] bpf: Test_verifier, #70 error message updates for 32-bit right shift Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-09 18:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 08/15] selftests/bpf: Fix test_align verifier log patterns Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-09 18:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 09/15] selftests/bpf: Fix "dubious pointer arithmetic" test Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-09 18:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 10/15] KVM: Dont null dereference ops->destroy Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-09 18:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 11/15] selftests: KVM: Handle compiler optimizations in ucall Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-09 18:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 12/15] media: v4l2-mem2mem: Apply DST_QUEUE_OFF_BASE on MMAP buffers across ioctls Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-09 18:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 13/15] macintosh/adb: fix oob read in do_adb_query() function Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-09 18:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 14/15] x86/speculation: Add RSB VM Exit protections Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-09 18:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 15/15] x86/speculation: Add LFENCE to RSB fill sequence Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-09 18:56 ` [PATCH 5.4 00/15] 5.4.210-rc1 review Florian Fainelli
2022-08-10 9:12 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-08-10 13:20 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
2022-08-10 13:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-08-10 14:45 ` Shuah Khan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220809175510.492285257@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ovidiu.panait@windriver.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox