From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97076C25B08 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 18:35:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237626AbiHQSfF (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2022 14:35:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40120 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237097AbiHQSfD (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2022 14:35:03 -0400 Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc (Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:520::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6F0B9C1D0; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 11:35:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fw by Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oONsT-0001oq-Rk; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 20:34:53 +0200 Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 20:34:53 +0200 From: Florian Westphal To: Daniel Xu Cc: Florian Westphal , Toke =?iso-8859-15?Q?H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= , "bpf@vger.kernel.org" , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , pablo@netfilter.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: Add support for writing to nf_conn:mark Message-ID: <20220817183453.GA24008@breakpoint.cc> References: <871qth87r1.fsf@toke.dk> <20220815224011.GA9821@breakpoint.cc> <5c7ac2ab-942f-4ee7-8a9c-39948a40681c@www.fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <5c7ac2ab-942f-4ee7-8a9c-39948a40681c@www.fastmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Daniel Xu wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022, at 4:40 PM, Florian Westphal wrote: > > Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > >> > Support direct writes to nf_conn:mark from TC and XDP prog types. This > >> > is useful when applications want to store per-connection metadata. This > >> > is also particularly useful for applications that run both bpf and > >> > iptables/nftables because the latter can trivially access this metadata. > >> > > >> > One example use case would be if a bpf prog is responsible for advanced > >> > packet classification and iptables/nftables is later used for routing > >> > due to pre-existing/legacy code. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu > >> > >> Didn't we agree the last time around that all field access should be > >> using helper kfuncs instead of allowing direct writes to struct nf_conn? > > > > I don't see why ct->mark needs special handling. > > > > It might be possible we need to change accesses on nf/tc side to use > > READ/WRITE_ONCE though. > > I reviewed some of the LKMM literature and I would concur that > READ/WRITE_ONCE() is necessary. Especially after this patchset. > > However, it's unclear to me if this is a latent issue. IOW: is reading > ct->mark protected by a lock? I only briefly looked but it doesn't > seem like it. No, its not protected by a lock. READ/WRITE_ONCE is unrelated to your patchset, this is a pre-existing "bug".