From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59182C28D13 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 23:21:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238598AbiHVXVu (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 19:21:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57370 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238636AbiHVXVn (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 19:21:43 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE82455091 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 16:21:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1661210502; x=1692746502; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TKnRFyZojBDepq0MeETIBlamkN8wx2nn6IJckBft1yI=; b=d1jR9gwwuFgxsAoXJ82JqHvIZrDTBCF2GYorEBjMCX8bKNa/da4CdVbI A04yOkAB1fDCIO1sk/6/jwN3mh1IXLpqiSnXDD0lh66DnLgp6OGAyA8vT czCwFi5eIL256b4se0F1d1LsBOPnMymKQ0l28XdNjAQ0vAUTMbduMpSfS CtSb3Dyr9OS4lV4MA6d2WTRpbOijGxbpVlb0UKIy7OdSEfLXZsIa0MXIv +45bPW8t4avRCG4CcjJVzwclQAQZMXqxWxI1zOpfvAX68MEPCa9q1aZ8v g34MIuAj/ETqdr6kwzgFRUGwur3yxnYkUHVPw6NjcEtUxKK4A7uMNg6Q9 g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10447"; a="294828253" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,255,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="294828253" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Aug 2022 16:21:42 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,255,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="559935988" Received: from jacob-builder.jf.intel.com (HELO jacob-builder) ([10.7.198.157]) by orsmga003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Aug 2022 16:21:42 -0700 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 16:24:54 -0700 From: Jacob Pan To: Dave Hansen Cc: LKML , iommu@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org, Joerg Roedel , Lu Baolu , Raj Ashok , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , Ingo Molnar , "Tian, Kevin" , Yi Liu , jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu: Use the user PGD for SVA if PTI is enabled Message-ID: <20220822162454.490ad1f2@jacob-builder> In-Reply-To: <09bccb93-2c0e-4962-0c46-c84c22fa140d@intel.com> References: <20220822201213.352289-1-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <20220822201213.352289-3-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <09bccb93-2c0e-4962-0c46-c84c22fa140d@intel.com> Organization: OTC X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Dave, On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 15:31:20 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 8/22/22 13:12, Jacob Pan wrote: > > @@ -394,7 +395,9 @@ static struct iommu_sva *intel_svm_bind_mm(struct > > intel_iommu *iommu, sflags = (flags & SVM_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE) ? > > PASID_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE : 0; > > sflags |= cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_LA57) ? > > PASID_FLAG_FL5LP : 0; > > - ret = intel_pasid_setup_first_level(iommu, dev, mm->pgd, > > mm->pasid, + > > + pgd = static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTI) ? > > kernel_to_user_pgdp(mm->pgd) : mm->pgd; > > + ret = intel_pasid_setup_first_level(iommu, dev, pgd, mm->pasid, > > FLPT_DEFAULT_DID, sflags); > > > > This X86_FEATURE_PTI should really be done within a helper. > > I'd probably do this with a *new* helper since all of the existing > kernel_to_user_pgdp() users seem to be within a PTI #ifdef. > > Maybe something like: > > pgd_t *mm_user_pgd(struct mm_struct *mm) > { > #ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION > if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_PTI)) > return kernel_to_user_pgdp(mm->pgd); > #endif > return mm->pgd; > } > Sounds good. I thought about a helper also, thinking there are so many other cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTI) checks already :) > That #ifdef could even go away if your kernel_to_user_pgdp() stub from > patch 1/2 was available. I'm not sure it's worth it though. I will remove 1/2 and keep the uniform style of the existing helpers. Thanks for the suggestion, Jacob