[PATCH 5.15 081/244] vsock: Set socket state back to SS_UNCONNECTED in vsock_connect_timeout()

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-23T10:08:28Z

From: Peilin Ye <peilin.ye@bytedance.com>

commit a3e7b29e30854ed67be0d17687e744ad0c769c4b upstream.

Imagine two non-blocking vsock_connect() requests on the same socket.
The first request schedules @connect_work, and after it times out,
vsock_connect_timeout() sets *sock* state back to TCP_CLOSE, but keeps
*socket* state as SS_CONNECTING.

Later, the second request returns -EALREADY, meaning the socket "already
has a pending connection in progress", even though the first request has
already timed out.

As suggested by Stefano, fix it by setting *socket* state back to
SS_UNCONNECTED, so that the second request will return -ETIMEDOUT.

Suggested-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Fixes: d021c344051a ("VSOCK: Introduce VM Sockets")
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <peilin.ye@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -1285,6 +1285,7 @@ static void vsock_connect_timeout(struct
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_SENT &&
(sk->sk_shutdown != SHUTDOWN_MASK)) {
sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
+ sk->sk_socket->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
sk->sk_err = ETIMEDOUT;
sk_error_report(sk);
vsock_transport_cancel_pkt(vsk);