From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@fb.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rcu 3/3] rcu: Simplify rcu_init_nohz() cpumask handling
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 11:15:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220901091557.GA101341@lothringen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220831181044.2694488-3-paulmck@kernel.org>
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 11:10:44AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
>
> In kernels built with either CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL=y or
> CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y, additional CPUs must be added to rcu_nocb_mask.
> Except that kernels booted without the rcu_nocbs= will not have
> allocated rcu_nocb_mask. And the current rcu_init_nohz() function uses
> its need_rcu_nocb_mask and offload_all local variables to track the
> rcu_nocb and nohz_full state.
>
> But there is a much simpler approach, namely creating a cpumask pointer
> to track the default and then using cpumask_available() to check the
> rcu_nocb_mask state. This commit takes this approach, thereby simplifying
> and shortening the rcu_init_nohz() function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 32 +++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> index 0a5f0ef414845..c8167be2288fa 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> @@ -1210,45 +1210,31 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_nocb_cpu_offload);
> void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
> {
> int cpu;
> - bool need_rcu_nocb_mask = false;
> - bool offload_all = false;
> struct rcu_data *rdp;
> + const struct cpumask *cpumask = NULL;
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL)
> - if (!rcu_state.nocb_is_setup) {
> - need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
> - offload_all = true;
> - }
> -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL) */
> -
> -#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> - if (tick_nohz_full_running && !cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask)) {
> - need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
> - offload_all = false; /* NO_HZ_FULL has its own mask. */
> - }
> -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> + cpumask = cpu_possible_mask;
You're missing the rcu_state.nocb_is_setup check, so
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL will now always override the rcu_nocbs=
parameter (should be the other way around).
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> + if (tick_nohz_full_running && !cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask))
> + cpumask = tick_nohz_full_mask;
> +#endif
A subtle behaviour difference here too: CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL will
now override nohz_full=
I don't mind, it's probably what we want in the end, but the changelog should
tell about it, or even better, this should be a separate change.
Thanks.
>
> - if (need_rcu_nocb_mask) {
> + if (cpumask) {
> if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)) {
> if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&rcu_nocb_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> pr_info("rcu_nocb_mask allocation failed, callback offloading disabled.\n");
> return;
> }
> }
> +
> + cpumask_or(rcu_nocb_mask, rcu_nocb_mask, cpumask);
> rcu_state.nocb_is_setup = true;
> }
>
> if (!rcu_state.nocb_is_setup)
> return;
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> - if (tick_nohz_full_running)
> - cpumask_or(rcu_nocb_mask, rcu_nocb_mask, tick_nohz_full_mask);
> -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> -
> - if (offload_all)
> - cpumask_setall(rcu_nocb_mask);
> -
> if (!cpumask_subset(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask)) {
> pr_info("\tNote: kernel parameter 'rcu_nocbs=', 'nohz_full', or 'isolcpus=' contains nonexistent CPUs.\n");
> cpumask_and(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask,
> --
> 2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-01 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-31 18:10 [PATCH rcu 0/7] Callback-offload (nocb) updates for v6.1 Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-31 18:10 ` [PATCH rcu 1/3] rcu/nocb: Choose the right rcuog/rcuop kthreads to output Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-31 18:10 ` [PATCH rcu 2/3] rcu/nocb: Add CPU number to CPU-{,de}offload failure messages Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-31 18:10 ` [PATCH rcu 3/3] rcu: Simplify rcu_init_nohz() cpumask handling Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-01 9:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2022-09-01 10:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-01 11:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-01 11:36 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-09-01 13:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220901091557.GA101341@lothringen \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox