The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] string: Introduce strtomem() and strtomem_pad()
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 11:35:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202209011123.27D7D67@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdX1H_ssPDJH47kcXhmoAZzYEgJC2zaMp-d_2+VriZYAoA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 10:39:19AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> [...]
> > When the "__nonstring" attributes are missing, the intent of the
> > programmer becomes ambiguous for whether the lack of a trailing NUL
> > in the p.small copy is a bug. Additionally, it's not clear whether
> > the trailing padding in the p.big copy is _needed_. Both cases
> > become unambiguous with:
> >
> > strtomem(p.small, "hello");
> > strtomem_pad(p.big, "hello");
> 
> strtomem_pad(p.big, "hello", 0);

Oops, thanks. I will adjust the example. And actually, instead of these
notes just living in commit logs, I realize I can update the kerndoc
for strncpy with a "here's now to pick a replacement" table...

> > See also https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/90
> >
> > Expand the memcpy KUnit tests to include these functions.
> >
> > Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> > Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> > Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> 
> The idea looks good to me, but I guess Linus has something to
> say, too.
> 
> > --- a/include/linux/string.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/string.h
> > @@ -260,6 +260,49 @@ static inline const char *kbasename(const char *path)
> >  void memcpy_and_pad(void *dest, size_t dest_len, const void *src, size_t count,
> >                     int pad);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * strtomem_pad - Copy NUL-terminated string to non-NUL-terminated buffer
> > + *
> > + * @dest: Pointer of destination character array (marked as __nonstring)
> > + * @src: Pointer to NUL-terminated string
> > + * @pad: Padding character to fill any remaining bytes of @dest after copy
> > + *
> > + * This is a replacement for strncpy() uses where the destination is not
> > + * a NUL-terminated string, but with bounds checking on the source size, and
> > + * an explicit padding character. If padding is not required, use strtomem().
> > + *
> > + * Note that the size of @dest is not an argument, as the length of @dest
> > + * must be discoverable by the compiler.
> > + */
> > +#define strtomem_pad(dest, src, pad)   do {                            \
> > +       const size_t _dest_len = __builtin_object_size(dest, 1);        \
> > +                                                                       \
> > +       BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(_dest_len) ||                \
> > +                    _dest_len == (size_t)-1);                          \
> 
> I think you want to include __must_be_array(dest) here.

I didn't do that for the cases where we may be writing to non-array
destinations (e.g. see the cast from u64 in the strncpy use in
tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c). Since what we need to know is the
object size, it does not strictly need to be an array.

> > [...]
> > +       memset(&wrap, 0xFF, sizeof(wrap));
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, wrap.canary1, -1UL,
> 
> -1L or ULONG_MAX (everywhere)

Yeah, ULONG_MAX looks best. Thanks!

> 
> > +                           "bad initial canary value");
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, wrap.canary2, -1UL,
> > +                           "bad initial canary value");
> > +
> > +       /* Check unpadded copy leaves surroundings untouched. */
> > +       strtomem(wrap.output, input);
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, wrap.canary1, -1UL);
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, wrap.output[0], input[0]);
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, wrap.output[1], input[1]);
> > +       for (int i = 2; i < sizeof(wrap.output); i++)
> 
> unsigned int i (everywhere)

I guess, but why? This could even be u8.

Thanks for the review!

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-01 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-31 23:00 [PATCH] string: Introduce strtomem() and strtomem_pad() Kees Cook
2022-09-01  8:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-09-01 18:35   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-09-01 19:14     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-09-01 19:23       ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202209011123.27D7D67@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox