Re: linux-next: manual merge of the btrfs tree with the btrfs-fixes tree

[David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>]

On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 10:15:49AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 09:50:55 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the btrfs tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   fs/btrfs/zoned.c
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   6ca64ac27631 ("btrfs: zoned: fix mounting with conventional zones")
> > 
> > from the btrfs-fixes tree and commit:
> > 
> >   e5182af66852 ("btrfs: convert block group bit field to use bit helpers")
> > 
> > from the btrfs tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (the former removed some of the code modified by the latter)
> > and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
> > is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> > upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
> > also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> > tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
> 
> Actually the fix up is below ...

Thanks, looks correct to me. I've pushed a new for-next snapshot that
has the conflict resolved too.