From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
To: <vkoul@kernel.org>, <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
<pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>, <sanyog.r.kale@intel.com>
Cc: <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@opensource.cirrus.com>,
Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] soundwire: bus: Don't re-enumerate before status is UNATTACHED
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 09:52:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220907085259.3602-4-rf@opensource.cirrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220907085259.3602-1-rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Don't re-enumerate a peripheral on #0 until we have seen and
handled an UNATTACHED notification for that peripheral.
Without this, it is possible for the UNATTACHED status to be missed
and so the slave->status remains at ATTACHED. If slave->status never
changes to UNATTACHED the child driver will never be notified of the
UNATTACH, and the code in sdw_handle_slave_status() will skip the
second part of enumeration because the slave->status has not changed.
This scenario can happen because PINGs are handled in a workqueue
function which is working from a snapshot of an old PING, and there
is no guarantee when this function will run.
A peripheral could report attached in the PING being handled by
sdw_handle_slave_status(), but has since reverted to device #0 and is
then found in the loop in sdw_program_device_num(). Previously the
code would not have updated slave->status to UNATTACHED because it had
not yet handled a PING where that peripheral had UNATTACHED.
This situation happens fairly frequently with multiple peripherals on
a bus that are intentionally reset (for example after downloading
firmware).
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
---
drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
index 1cc858b4107d..6e569a875a9b 100644
--- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
@@ -773,6 +773,16 @@ static int sdw_program_device_num(struct sdw_bus *bus)
if (sdw_compare_devid(slave, id) == 0) {
found = true;
+ /*
+ * To prevent skipping state-machine stages don't
+ * program a device until we've seen it UNATTACH.
+ * Must return here because no other device on #0
+ * can be detected until this one has been
+ * assigned a device ID.
+ */
+ if (slave->status != SDW_SLAVE_UNATTACHED)
+ return 0;
+
/*
* Assign a new dev_num to this Slave and
* not mark it present. It will be marked
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-07 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-07 8:52 [PATCH v2 0/5] soundwire: Fixes for spurious and missing UNATTACH Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-07 8:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] soundwire: cadence: fix updating slave status when a bus has multiple peripherals Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-07 8:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] soundwire: bus: Don't lose unattach notifications Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-07 8:52 ` Richard Fitzgerald [this message]
2022-09-12 11:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] soundwire: bus: Don't re-enumerate before status is UNATTACHED Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-09-07 8:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] soundwire: cadence: Fix lost ATTACHED interrupts when enumerating Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-12 11:05 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-09-12 12:36 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-07 8:52 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] soundwire: bus: Don't exit early if no device IDs were programmed Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-12 11:43 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-09-12 12:25 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-12 17:09 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-09-13 15:30 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-13 17:59 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220907085259.3602-4-rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
--to=rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sanyog.r.kale@intel.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox