From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
To: <vkoul@kernel.org>, <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
<pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>, <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
<peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>,
<ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
<kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>, <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
<sanyog.r.kale@intel.com>, <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
<sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@opensource.cirrus.com>,
Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] soundwire: bus: Do not forcibly disable child pm_runtime
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 11:13:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220907101402.4685-2-rf@opensource.cirrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220907101402.4685-1-rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Do not call pm_runtime_disable() of a child driver in
sdw_delete_slave(). We really should never be trying to disable
another driver's pm_runtime - it is up to the child driver to
disable it or the core driver framework cleanup. The driver core
will runtime-resume a driver before calling its remove() so we
shouldn't break that.
The patch that introduced this is
commit dff70572e9a3 ("soundwire: bus: disable pm_runtime in sdw_slave_delete")
which says:
"prevent any race condition with the resume being executed after the
bus and slave devices are removed"
The actual problem is that the bus driver is shutting itself down before
the child drivers have been removed, which is the wrong way around (see
for example I2C and SPI drivers). If this is fixed, the bus driver will
still be operational when the driver framework runtime_resumes the child
drivers to remove them. Then the bus driver will remove() and can shut
down safely.
Also note that the child drivers are not necessarily idle when the bus
driver is removed, so disabling their pm_runtime and stopping the bus
might break more than only their remove().
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
---
drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
index 0bcc2d161eb9..99429892221b 100644
--- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
@@ -151,8 +151,6 @@ static int sdw_delete_slave(struct device *dev, void *data)
struct sdw_slave *slave = dev_to_sdw_dev(dev);
struct sdw_bus *bus = slave->bus;
- pm_runtime_disable(dev);
-
sdw_slave_debugfs_exit(slave);
mutex_lock(&bus->bus_lock);
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-07 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-07 10:13 [PATCH 0/7] soundwire: Fix driver removal Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-07 10:13 ` Richard Fitzgerald [this message]
2022-09-12 10:43 ` [PATCH 1/7] soundwire: bus: Do not forcibly disable child pm_runtime Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-09-07 10:13 ` [PATCH 2/7] soundwire: intel_init: Separate shutdown and cleanup Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-07 10:13 ` [PATCH 3/7] ASoC: SOF: Intel: Don't disable Soundwire interrupt before the bus has shut down Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-07 11:26 ` Mark Brown
2022-09-07 10:13 ` [PATCH 4/7] soundwire: bus: Add remove callback to struct sdw_master_ops Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-07 10:14 ` [PATCH 5/7] soundwire: intel: Don't disable interrupt until children are removed Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-12 10:53 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-09-12 15:36 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-12 17:12 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-09-13 9:29 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-07 10:14 ` [PATCH 6/7] soundwire: intel: Don't disable pm_runtime " Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-07 10:14 ` [PATCH 7/7] soundwire: bus: Fix premature removal of sdw_slave objects Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-12 10:57 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220907101402.4685-2-rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
--to=rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.baluta@nxp.com \
--cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sanyog.r.kale@intel.com \
--cc=sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox