public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/kprobes: Fix kprobes instruction boudary check with CONFIG_RETHUNK
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 22:53:42 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220907225342.7932294dc37fed3fbfd66d0e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YxiVvT56y0muNIKe@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, 7 Sep 2022 14:59:41 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 09:55:21AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Since the CONFIG_RETHUNK and CONFIG_SLS will use INT3 for padding after
> > RET instruction, kprobes always failes to check the probed instruction
> > boundary by decoding the function body if the probed address is after
> > such paddings (Note that some conditional code blocks will be placed
> > after RET instruction, if compiler decides it is not on the hot path.)
> > This is because kprobes expects someone (e.g. kgdb) puts the INT3 as
> > a software breakpoint and it will replace the original instruction.
> > But There are INT3 just for padding in the function, it doesn't need
> > to recover the original instruction.
> > 
> > To avoid this issue, if kprobe finds an INT3, it gets the address of
> > next non-INT3 byte, and search a branch which jumps to the address.
> > If there is the branch, these INT3 will be for padding, so it can be
> > skipped.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Fixes: 15e67227c49a ("x86: Undo return-thunk damage")
> 
> I take objection with this Fixes tag.. if anything it should be the SLS
> commit that predates this.
> 
>   e463a09af2f0 ("x86: Add straight-line-speculation mitigation")

Thanks, I'll change to it.


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-07 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-07  0:55 [PATCH 0/2] x86/kprobes: Fixes for CONFIG_RETHUNK Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2022-09-07  0:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/kprobes: Fix kprobes instruction boudary check with CONFIG_RETHUNK Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2022-09-07  7:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07  9:01     ` [PATCH] objtool,x86: Teach decode about LOOP* instructions Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07  9:06       ` David Laight
2022-09-07  9:40         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 11:13           ` David Laight
2022-09-15 14:24       ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07  9:12     ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/kprobes: Fix kprobes instruction boudary check with CONFIG_RETHUNK Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-07  9:38       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07  9:53         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-07  8:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07  8:11     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07  9:49     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-07 10:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 11:44         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 13:05     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 14:14       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-07 14:27         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 15:22           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-07 12:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 13:49     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-07 14:28       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 12:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 13:53     ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2022-09-07  0:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/kprobes: Fix optprobe optimization " Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2022-09-07  6:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] x86/kprobes: Fixes for CONFIG_RETHUNK Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220907225342.7932294dc37fed3fbfd66d0e@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=suleiman@google.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox