From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/kprobes: Fix kprobes instruction boudary check with CONFIG_RETHUNK
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 22:53:42 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220907225342.7932294dc37fed3fbfd66d0e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YxiVvT56y0muNIKe@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, 7 Sep 2022 14:59:41 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 09:55:21AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> >
> > Since the CONFIG_RETHUNK and CONFIG_SLS will use INT3 for padding after
> > RET instruction, kprobes always failes to check the probed instruction
> > boundary by decoding the function body if the probed address is after
> > such paddings (Note that some conditional code blocks will be placed
> > after RET instruction, if compiler decides it is not on the hot path.)
> > This is because kprobes expects someone (e.g. kgdb) puts the INT3 as
> > a software breakpoint and it will replace the original instruction.
> > But There are INT3 just for padding in the function, it doesn't need
> > to recover the original instruction.
> >
> > To avoid this issue, if kprobe finds an INT3, it gets the address of
> > next non-INT3 byte, and search a branch which jumps to the address.
> > If there is the branch, these INT3 will be for padding, so it can be
> > skipped.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Fixes: 15e67227c49a ("x86: Undo return-thunk damage")
>
> I take objection with this Fixes tag.. if anything it should be the SLS
> commit that predates this.
>
> e463a09af2f0 ("x86: Add straight-line-speculation mitigation")
Thanks, I'll change to it.
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-07 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-07 0:55 [PATCH 0/2] x86/kprobes: Fixes for CONFIG_RETHUNK Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2022-09-07 0:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/kprobes: Fix kprobes instruction boudary check with CONFIG_RETHUNK Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2022-09-07 7:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 9:01 ` [PATCH] objtool,x86: Teach decode about LOOP* instructions Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 9:06 ` David Laight
2022-09-07 9:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 11:13 ` David Laight
2022-09-15 14:24 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 9:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/kprobes: Fix kprobes instruction boudary check with CONFIG_RETHUNK Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-07 9:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 9:53 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-07 8:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 8:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 9:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-07 10:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 11:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 13:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 14:14 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-07 14:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 15:22 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-07 12:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 13:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-07 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 12:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 13:53 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2022-09-07 0:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/kprobes: Fix optprobe optimization " Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2022-09-07 6:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] x86/kprobes: Fixes for CONFIG_RETHUNK Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220907225342.7932294dc37fed3fbfd66d0e@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox