From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
Cc: Liao Chang <liaochang1@huawei.com>,
paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, mhiramat@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv/kprobe: Optimize the performance of patching instruction slot
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 07:28:36 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220908072836.0e9e0833ddfa4d413a2254be@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YxjTF2FlIJbbKq0p@xhacker>
On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 01:21:27 +0800
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 10:33:27AM +0800, Liao Chang wrote:
> > Since no race condition occurs on each instruction slot, hence it is
> > safe to patch instruction slot without stopping machine.
>
> hmm, IMHO there's race when arming kprobe under SMP, so stopping
> machine is necessary here. Maybe I misundertand something.
Yeah, usually the self modifying code needs stop other CPUs some known
points so that other CPUs does not execute the instruction which will
be modified.
Even if a chip ensures that, is that safe for other implementations?
(Does RISC-V specification guarantee this behavior?)
Thank you,
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 8 +++++---
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> > index e6e950b7cf32..eff7d7fab535 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> > @@ -24,12 +24,14 @@ post_kprobe_handler(struct kprobe *, struct kprobe_ctlblk *, struct pt_regs *);
> > static void __kprobes arch_prepare_ss_slot(struct kprobe *p)
> > {
> > unsigned long offset = GET_INSN_LENGTH(p->opcode);
> > + const kprobe_opcode_t brk_insn = __BUG_INSN_32;
> > + kprobe_opcode_t slot[MAX_INSN_SIZE];
> >
> > p->ainsn.api.restore = (unsigned long)p->addr + offset;
> >
> > - patch_text(p->ainsn.api.insn, p->opcode);
> > - patch_text((void *)((unsigned long)(p->ainsn.api.insn) + offset),
> > - __BUG_INSN_32);
> > + memcpy(slot, &p->opcode, offset);
> > + memcpy((void *)((unsigned long)slot + offset), &brk_insn, 4);
> > + patch_text_nosync(p->ainsn.api.insn, slot, offset + 4);
> > }
> >
> > static void __kprobes arch_prepare_simulate(struct kprobe *p)
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-07 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-07 2:33 [PATCH] riscv/kprobe: Optimize the performance of patching instruction slot Liao Chang
2022-09-07 17:21 ` Jisheng Zhang
2022-09-07 22:28 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2022-09-08 1:43 ` liaochang (A)
2022-09-08 12:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-09 1:55 ` liaochang (A)
2022-09-10 2:24 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220908072836.0e9e0833ddfa4d413a2254be@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
--cc=liaochang1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox