From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
svens@linux.ibm.com, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org,
robin.murphy@arm.com, jgg@nvidia.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] iommu/s390: Fix duplicate domain attachments
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 17:14:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220915151402.121032-2-schnelle@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220915151402.121032-1-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Since commit fa7e9ecc5e1c ("iommu/s390: Tolerate repeat attach_dev
calls") we can end up with duplicates in the list of devices attached to
a domain. This is inefficient and confusing since only one domain can
actually be in control of the IOMMU translations for a device. Fix this
by detaching the device from the previous domain, if any, on attach.
This also makes the restore behavior analogous between IOMMU and DMA API
control.
Fixes: fa7e9ecc5e1c ("iommu/s390: Tolerate repeat attach_dev calls")
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c
index c898bcbbce11..de8f76775240 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c
@@ -83,14 +83,41 @@ static void s390_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
kfree(s390_domain);
}
+static bool __s390_iommu_detach_device(struct s390_domain *s390_domain,
+ struct zpci_dev *zdev)
+{
+ struct s390_domain_device *domain_device, *tmp;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ bool found = false;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(domain_device, tmp, &s390_domain->devices,
+ list) {
+ if (domain_device->zdev == zdev) {
+ list_del(&domain_device->list);
+ kfree(domain_device);
+ found = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
+
+ if (found) {
+ zdev->s390_domain = NULL;
+ zpci_unregister_ioat(zdev, 0);
+ }
+ return found;
+}
+
static int s390_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
struct device *dev)
{
struct s390_domain *s390_domain = to_s390_domain(domain);
struct zpci_dev *zdev = to_zpci_dev(dev);
struct s390_domain_device *domain_device;
+ struct s390_domain *prev_domain = NULL;
unsigned long flags;
- int cc, rc;
+ int cc, rc = 0;
if (!zdev)
return -ENODEV;
@@ -99,16 +126,16 @@ static int s390_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
if (!domain_device)
return -ENOMEM;
- if (zdev->dma_table && !zdev->s390_domain) {
- cc = zpci_dma_exit_device(zdev);
- if (cc) {
+ if (zdev->s390_domain) {
+ prev_domain = zdev->s390_domain;
+ if (!__s390_iommu_detach_device(zdev->s390_domain, zdev))
+ rc = -EIO;
+ } else if (zdev->dma_table) {
+ if (zpci_dma_exit_device(zdev))
rc = -EIO;
- goto out_free;
- }
}
-
- if (zdev->s390_domain)
- zpci_unregister_ioat(zdev, 0);
+ if (rc)
+ goto out_free;
zdev->dma_table = s390_domain->dma_table;
cc = zpci_register_ioat(zdev, 0, zdev->start_dma, zdev->end_dma,
@@ -129,7 +156,7 @@ static int s390_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
domain->geometry.aperture_end != zdev->end_dma) {
rc = -EINVAL;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
- goto out_restore;
+ goto out_unregister_restore;
}
domain_device->zdev = zdev;
zdev->s390_domain = s390_domain;
@@ -138,14 +165,15 @@ static int s390_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
return 0;
+out_unregister_restore:
+ zpci_unregister_ioat(zdev, 0);
out_restore:
- if (!zdev->s390_domain) {
+ zdev->dma_table = NULL;
+ if (prev_domain)
+ s390_iommu_attach_device(&prev_domain->domain,
+ dev);
+ else
zpci_dma_init_device(zdev);
- } else {
- zdev->dma_table = zdev->s390_domain->dma_table;
- zpci_register_ioat(zdev, 0, zdev->start_dma, zdev->end_dma,
- virt_to_phys(zdev->dma_table));
- }
out_free:
kfree(domain_device);
@@ -157,30 +185,14 @@ static void s390_iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
{
struct s390_domain *s390_domain = to_s390_domain(domain);
struct zpci_dev *zdev = to_zpci_dev(dev);
- struct s390_domain_device *domain_device, *tmp;
- unsigned long flags;
- int found = 0;
+ bool detached;
if (!zdev)
return;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(domain_device, tmp, &s390_domain->devices,
- list) {
- if (domain_device->zdev == zdev) {
- list_del(&domain_device->list);
- kfree(domain_device);
- found = 1;
- break;
- }
- }
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
-
- if (found && (zdev->s390_domain == s390_domain)) {
- zdev->s390_domain = NULL;
- zpci_unregister_ioat(zdev, 0);
+ detached = __s390_iommu_detach_device(s390_domain, zdev);
+ if (detached)
zpci_dma_init_device(zdev);
- }
}
static struct iommu_device *s390_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-15 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-15 15:13 [PATCH 0/3] iommu/s390: Fixes related to repeat attach_dev calls Niklas Schnelle
2022-09-15 15:14 ` Niklas Schnelle [this message]
2022-09-20 14:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] iommu/s390: Fix duplicate domain attachments Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-20 15:22 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-09-15 15:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] s390/pci: remove unused bus_next field from struct zpci_dev Niklas Schnelle
2022-09-15 15:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] iommu/s390: Get rid of s390_domain_device Niklas Schnelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220915151402.121032-2-schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--to=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox