[PATCH 5.19 25/38] blk-lib: fix blkdev_issue_secure_erase

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>

commit c4fa368466cc1b60bb92f867741488930ddd6034 upstream.

There's a bug in blkdev_issue_secure_erase. The statement
"unsigned int len = min_t(sector_t, nr_sects, max_sectors);"
sets the variable "len" to the length in sectors, but the statement
"bio->bi_iter.bi_size = len" treats it as if it were in bytes.
The statements "sector += len << SECTOR_SHIFT" and "nr_sects -= len <<
SECTOR_SHIFT" are thinko.

This patch fixes it.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org	# v5.19
Fixes: 44abff2c0b97 ("block: decouple REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE from REQ_OP_DISCARD")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/alpine.LRH.2.02.2209141549480.28100@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 block/blk-lib.c |   11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/block/blk-lib.c
+++ b/block/blk-lib.c
@@ -311,6 +311,11 @@ int blkdev_issue_secure_erase(struct blo
 	struct blk_plug plug;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	/* make sure that "len << SECTOR_SHIFT" doesn't overflow */
+	if (max_sectors > UINT_MAX >> SECTOR_SHIFT)
+		max_sectors = UINT_MAX >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
+	max_sectors &= ~bs_mask;
+
 	if (max_sectors == 0)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	if ((sector | nr_sects) & bs_mask)
@@ -324,10 +329,10 @@ int blkdev_issue_secure_erase(struct blo
 
 		bio = blk_next_bio(bio, bdev, 0, REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE, gfp);
 		bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
-		bio->bi_iter.bi_size = len;
+		bio->bi_iter.bi_size = len << SECTOR_SHIFT;
 
-		sector += len << SECTOR_SHIFT;
-		nr_sects -= len << SECTOR_SHIFT;
+		sector += len;
+		nr_sects -= len;
 		if (!nr_sects) {
 			ret = submit_bio_wait(bio);
 			bio_put(bio);