[PATCH 5.19 091/207] ice: Fix crash by keep old cfg when update TCs more than queues

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-09-26T11:46:46Z

From: Ding Hui <dinghui@sangfor.com.cn>

[ Upstream commit a509702cac95a8b450228a037c8542f57e538e5b ]

There are problems if allocated queues less than Traffic Classes.

Commit a632b2a4c920 ("ice: ethtool: Prohibit improper channel config
for DCB") already disallow setting less queues than TCs.

Another case is if we first set less queues, and later update more TCs
config due to LLDP, ice_vsi_cfg_tc() will failed but left dirty
num_txq/rxq and tc_cfg in vsi, that will cause invalid pointer access.

[ 95.968089] ice 0000:3b:00.1: More TCs defined than queues/rings allocated.
[ 95.968092] ice 0000:3b:00.1: Trying to use more Rx queues (8), than were allocated (1)!
[ 95.968093] ice 0000:3b:00.1: Failed to config TC for VSI index: 0
[ 95.969621] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
[ 95.969705] CPU: 1 PID: 58405 Comm: lldpad Kdump: loaded Tainted: G U W O --------- -t - 4.18.0 #1
[ 95.969867] Hardware name: O.E.M/BC11SPSCB10, BIOS 8.23 12/30/2021
[ 95.969992] RIP: 0010:devm_kmalloc+0xa/0x60
[ 95.970052] Code: 5c ff ff ff 31 c0 5b 5d 41 5c c3 b8 f4 ff ff ff eb f4 0f 1f 40 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 89 d1 <8b> 97 60 02 00 00 48 8d 7e 18 48 39 f7 72 3f 55 89 ce 53 48 8b 4c
[ 95.970344] RSP: 0018:ffffc9003f553888 EFLAGS: 00010206
[ 95.970425] RAX: dead000000000200 RBX: ffffea003c425b00 RCX: 00000000006080c0
[ 95.970536] RDX: 00000000006080c0 RSI: 0000000000000200 RDI: dead000000000200
[ 95.970648] RBP: dead000000000200 R08: 00000000000463c0 R09: ffff888ffa900000
[ 95.970760] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: ffff888ff6b40100
[ 95.970870] R13: ffff888ff6a55018 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888ff6a55460
[ 95.970981] FS: 00007f51b7d24700(0000) GS:ffff88903ee80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 95.971108] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 95.971197] CR2: 00007fac5410d710 CR3: 0000000f2c1de002 CR4: 00000000007606e0
[ 95.971309] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 95.971419] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 95.971530] PKRU: 55555554
[ 95.971573] Call Trace:
[ 95.971622] ice_setup_rx_ring+0x39/0x110 [ice]
[ 95.971695] ice_vsi_setup_rx_rings+0x54/0x90 [ice]
[ 95.971774] ice_vsi_open+0x25/0x120 [ice]
[ 95.971843] ice_open_internal+0xb8/0x1f0 [ice]
[ 95.971919] ice_ena_vsi+0x4f/0xd0 [ice]
[ 95.971987] ice_dcb_ena_dis_vsi.constprop.5+0x29/0x90 [ice]
[ 95.972082] ice_pf_dcb_cfg+0x29a/0x380 [ice]
[ 95.972154] ice_dcbnl_setets+0x174/0x1b0 [ice]
[ 95.972220] dcbnl_ieee_set+0x89/0x230
[ 95.972279] ? dcbnl_ieee_del+0x150/0x150
[ 95.972341] dcb_doit+0x124/0x1b0
[ 95.972392] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x243/0x2f0
[ 95.972457] ? dcb_doit+0x14d/0x1b0
[ 95.972510] ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x1d3/0x280
[ 95.972591] ? rtnl_calcit.isra.31+0x100/0x100
[ 95.972661] netlink_rcv_skb+0xcf/0xf0
[ 95.972720] netlink_unicast+0x16d/0x220
[ 95.972781] netlink_sendmsg+0x2ba/0x3a0
[ 95.975891] sock_sendmsg+0x4c/0x50
[ 95.979032] ___sys_sendmsg+0x2e4/0x300
[ 95.982147] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x13e/0x190
[ 95.985242] ? __wake_up_common_lock+0x79/0x90
[ 95.988338] ? __check_object_size+0xac/0x1b0
[ 95.991440] ? _copy_to_user+0x22/0x30
[ 95.994539] ? move_addr_to_user+0xbb/0xd0
[ 95.997619] ? __sys_sendmsg+0x53/0x80
[ 96.000664] __sys_sendmsg+0x53/0x80
[ 96.003747] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x1d0
[ 96.006862] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca

Only update num_txq/rxq when passed check, and restore tc_cfg if setup
queue map failed.

Fixes: a632b2a4c920 ("ice: ethtool: Prohibit improper channel config for DCB")
Signed-off-by: Ding Hui <dinghui@sangfor.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Anatolii Gerasymenko <anatolii.gerasymenko@intel.com>
Tested-by: Arpana Arland <arpanax.arland@intel.com> (A Contingent worker at Intel)
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c | 42 +++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
index 6c4e1d45235e..1169fd7811b0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
@@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ static void ice_set_dflt_vsi_ctx(struct ice_hw *hw, struct ice_vsi_ctx *ctxt)
*/
static int ice_vsi_setup_q_map(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct ice_vsi_ctx *ctxt)
{
- u16 offset = 0, qmap = 0, tx_count = 0, pow = 0;
+ u16 offset = 0, qmap = 0, tx_count = 0, rx_count = 0, pow = 0;
u16 num_txq_per_tc, num_rxq_per_tc;
u16 qcount_tx = vsi->alloc_txq;
u16 qcount_rx = vsi->alloc_rxq;
@@ -978,23 +978,25 @@ static int ice_vsi_setup_q_map(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct ice_vsi_ctx *ctxt)
* at least 1)
*/
if (offset)
- vsi->num_rxq = offset;
+ rx_count = offset;
else
- vsi->num_rxq = num_rxq_per_tc;
+ rx_count = num_rxq_per_tc;

- if (vsi->num_rxq > vsi->alloc_rxq) {
+ if (rx_count > vsi->alloc_rxq) {
dev_err(ice_pf_to_dev(vsi->back), "Trying to use more Rx queues (%u), than were allocated (%u)!\n",
- vsi->num_rxq, vsi->alloc_rxq);
+ rx_count, vsi->alloc_rxq);
return -EINVAL;
}

- vsi->num_txq = tx_count;
- if (vsi->num_txq > vsi->alloc_txq) {
+ if (tx_count > vsi->alloc_txq) {
dev_err(ice_pf_to_dev(vsi->back), "Trying to use more Tx queues (%u), than were allocated (%u)!\n",
- vsi->num_txq, vsi->alloc_txq);
+ tx_count, vsi->alloc_txq);
return -EINVAL;
}

+ vsi->num_txq = tx_count;
+ vsi->num_rxq = rx_count;
+
if (vsi->type == ICE_VSI_VF && vsi->num_txq != vsi->num_rxq) {
dev_dbg(ice_pf_to_dev(vsi->back), "VF VSI should have same number of Tx and Rx queues. Hence making them equal\n");
/* since there is a chance that num_rxq could have been changed
@@ -3487,6 +3489,7 @@ ice_vsi_setup_q_map_mqprio(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct ice_vsi_ctx *ctxt,
u16 pow, offset = 0, qcount_tx = 0, qcount_rx = 0, qmap;
u16 tc0_offset = vsi->mqprio_qopt.qopt.offset[0];
int tc0_qcount = vsi->mqprio_qopt.qopt.count[0];
+ u16 new_txq, new_rxq;
u8 netdev_tc = 0;
int i;

@@ -3527,21 +3530,24 @@ ice_vsi_setup_q_map_mqprio(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct ice_vsi_ctx *ctxt,
}
}

- /* Set actual Tx/Rx queue pairs */
- vsi->num_txq = offset + qcount_tx;
- if (vsi->num_txq > vsi->alloc_txq) {
+ new_txq = offset + qcount_tx;
+ if (new_txq > vsi->alloc_txq) {
dev_err(ice_pf_to_dev(vsi->back), "Trying to use more Tx queues (%u), than were allocated (%u)!\n",
- vsi->num_txq, vsi->alloc_txq);
+ new_txq, vsi->alloc_txq);
return -EINVAL;
}

- vsi->num_rxq = offset + qcount_rx;
- if (vsi->num_rxq > vsi->alloc_rxq) {
+ new_rxq = offset + qcount_rx;
+ if (new_rxq > vsi->alloc_rxq) {
dev_err(ice_pf_to_dev(vsi->back), "Trying to use more Rx queues (%u), than were allocated (%u)!\n",
- vsi->num_rxq, vsi->alloc_rxq);
+ new_rxq, vsi->alloc_rxq);
return -EINVAL;
}

+ /* Set actual Tx/Rx queue pairs */
+ vsi->num_txq = new_txq;
+ vsi->num_rxq = new_rxq;
+
/* Setup queue TC[0].qmap for given VSI context */
ctxt->info.tc_mapping[0] = cpu_to_le16(qmap);
ctxt->info.q_mapping[0] = cpu_to_le16(vsi->rxq_map[0]);
@@ -3573,6 +3579,7 @@ int ice_vsi_cfg_tc(struct ice_vsi *vsi, u8 ena_tc)
{
u16 max_txqs[ICE_MAX_TRAFFIC_CLASS] = { 0 };
struct ice_pf *pf = vsi->back;
+ struct ice_tc_cfg old_tc_cfg;
struct ice_vsi_ctx *ctx;
struct device *dev;
int i, ret = 0;
@@ -3597,6 +3604,7 @@ int ice_vsi_cfg_tc(struct ice_vsi *vsi, u8 ena_tc)
max_txqs[i] = vsi->num_txq;
}

+ memcpy(&old_tc_cfg, &vsi->tc_cfg, sizeof(old_tc_cfg));
vsi->tc_cfg.ena_tc = ena_tc;
vsi->tc_cfg.numtc = num_tc;

@@ -3613,8 +3621,10 @@ int ice_vsi_cfg_tc(struct ice_vsi *vsi, u8 ena_tc)
else
ret = ice_vsi_setup_q_map(vsi, ctx);

- if (ret)
+ if (ret) {
+ memcpy(&vsi->tc_cfg, &old_tc_cfg, sizeof(vsi->tc_cfg));
goto out;
+ }

/* must to indicate which section of VSI context are being modified */
ctx->info.valid_sections = cpu_to_le16(ICE_AQ_VSI_PROP_RXQ_MAP_VALID);
--
2.35.1