Re: [PATCH 5.19 000/207] 5.19.12-rc1 review

Naresh Kamboju
2022-09-29T15:45:32Z

Hi Greg,

On Tue, 27 Sept 2022 at 13:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 01:25:52PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 16:13, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.12 release.
> > > There are 207 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 28 Sep 2022 10:07:26 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.12-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > Results from Linaro's test farm.
> > No regressions on arm, x86_64, and i386.
> > Following deadlock warning noticed on arm64 with kselftests Kconfigs.
>
> Is this new? If so, what commit causes it?

Anders bisected this reported problem [1] and found this commit caused
deadlock on all arm64 devices.

> Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> workqueue: don't skip lockdep work dependency in cancel_work_sync()

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYtxogp--B0Em6VCL0C3wwVFXa6xW-Rq2kQk3br+FPGLgg@mail.gmail.com/

- Naresh

--
Linaro LKFT