Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/83] 5.15.72-rc1 review

Guenter Roeck
2022-10-03T14:26:52Z

On 10/3/22 00:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.72 release.
> There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 05 Oct 2022 07:07:06 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>

perf fails to build.

In file included from util/evlist.h:13,
from builtin-annotate.c:21:
util/evsel.h:266:38: error: ‘PERF_TOOL_MAX’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘PERF_TXN_MAX’?
266 | extern const char *evsel__tool_names[PERF_TOOL_MAX];
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
| PERF_TXN_MAX
In file included from util/hist.h:8,
from builtin-diff.c:13:
util/evsel.h:266:38: error: ‘PERF_TOOL_MAX’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘PERF_TXN_MAX’?
266 | extern const char *evsel__tool_names[PERF_TOOL_MAX];
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
| PERF_TXN_MAX
In file included from util/evlist.h:13,
from builtin-evlist.c:11:
util/evsel.h:266:38: error: ‘PERF_TOOL_MAX’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘PERF_TXN_MAX’?
266 | extern const char *evsel__tool_names[PERF_TOOL_MAX];
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
| PERF_TXN_MAX
In file included from tools/perf/util/evlist.h:13,
from builtin-ftrace.c:24:
tools/perf/util/evsel.h:266:38: error: ‘PERF_TOOL_MAX’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘PERF_TXN_MAX’?
266 | extern const char *evsel__tool_names[PERF_TOOL_MAX];
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
| PERF_TXN_MAX
builtin-annotate.c: In function ‘cmd_annotate’:
builtin-annotate.c:594:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘symbol__validate_sym_arguments’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
594 | ret = symbol__validate_sym_arguments();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Guenter