From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 rcu 01/11] srcu: Convert ->srcu_lock_count and ->srcu_unlock_count to atomic
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 15:58:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221019225846.2501109-1-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221019225838.GA2500612@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
NMI-safe variants of srcu_read_lock() and srcu_read_unlock() are needed
by printk(), which on many architectures entails read-modify-write
atomic operations. This commit prepares Tree SRCU for this change by
making both ->srcu_lock_count and ->srcu_unlock_count by atomic_long_t.
[ paulmck: Apply feedback from John Ogness. ]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220910221947.171557773@linutronix.de/
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
---
include/linux/srcutree.h | 4 ++--
kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/srcutree.h b/include/linux/srcutree.h
index e3014319d1ade..0c4eca07d78d5 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcutree.h
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ struct srcu_struct;
*/
struct srcu_data {
/* Read-side state. */
- unsigned long srcu_lock_count[2]; /* Locks per CPU. */
- unsigned long srcu_unlock_count[2]; /* Unlocks per CPU. */
+ atomic_long_t srcu_lock_count[2]; /* Locks per CPU. */
+ atomic_long_t srcu_unlock_count[2]; /* Unlocks per CPU. */
/* Update-side state. */
spinlock_t __private lock ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index 1c304fec89c02..25e9458da6a26 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ static unsigned long srcu_readers_lock_idx(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct srcu_data *cpuc = per_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda, cpu);
- sum += READ_ONCE(cpuc->srcu_lock_count[idx]);
+ sum += atomic_long_read(&cpuc->srcu_lock_count[idx]);
}
return sum;
}
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ static unsigned long srcu_readers_unlock_idx(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct srcu_data *cpuc = per_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda, cpu);
- sum += READ_ONCE(cpuc->srcu_unlock_count[idx]);
+ sum += atomic_long_read(&cpuc->srcu_unlock_count[idx]);
}
return sum;
}
@@ -503,10 +503,10 @@ static bool srcu_readers_active(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct srcu_data *cpuc = per_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda, cpu);
- sum += READ_ONCE(cpuc->srcu_lock_count[0]);
- sum += READ_ONCE(cpuc->srcu_lock_count[1]);
- sum -= READ_ONCE(cpuc->srcu_unlock_count[0]);
- sum -= READ_ONCE(cpuc->srcu_unlock_count[1]);
+ sum += atomic_long_read(&cpuc->srcu_lock_count[0]);
+ sum += atomic_long_read(&cpuc->srcu_lock_count[1]);
+ sum -= atomic_long_read(&cpuc->srcu_unlock_count[0]);
+ sum -= atomic_long_read(&cpuc->srcu_unlock_count[1]);
}
return sum;
}
@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ int __srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
int idx;
idx = READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx) & 0x1;
- this_cpu_inc(ssp->sda->srcu_lock_count[idx]);
+ this_cpu_inc(ssp->sda->srcu_lock_count[idx].counter);
smp_mb(); /* B */ /* Avoid leaking the critical section. */
return idx;
}
@@ -650,7 +650,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__srcu_read_lock);
void __srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
{
smp_mb(); /* C */ /* Avoid leaking the critical section. */
- this_cpu_inc(ssp->sda->srcu_unlock_count[idx]);
+ this_cpu_inc(ssp->sda->srcu_unlock_count[idx].counter);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__srcu_read_unlock);
@@ -1687,8 +1687,8 @@ void srcu_torture_stats_print(struct srcu_struct *ssp, char *tt, char *tf)
struct srcu_data *sdp;
sdp = per_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda, cpu);
- u0 = data_race(sdp->srcu_unlock_count[!idx]);
- u1 = data_race(sdp->srcu_unlock_count[idx]);
+ u0 = data_race(atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_unlock_count[!idx]));
+ u1 = data_race(atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_unlock_count[idx]));
/*
* Make sure that a lock is always counted if the corresponding
@@ -1696,8 +1696,8 @@ void srcu_torture_stats_print(struct srcu_struct *ssp, char *tt, char *tf)
*/
smp_rmb();
- l0 = data_race(sdp->srcu_lock_count[!idx]);
- l1 = data_race(sdp->srcu_lock_count[idx]);
+ l0 = data_race(atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_lock_count[!idx]));
+ l1 = data_race(atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_lock_count[idx]));
c0 = l0 - u0;
c1 = l1 - u1;
--
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-19 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-19 22:58 [PATCH rcu 0/11] NMI-safe SRCU readers for v6.2 Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 22:58 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2022-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 rcu 02/11] srcu: Create an srcu_read_lock_nmisafe() and srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe() Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 rcu 03/11] srcu: Check for consistent per-CPU per-srcu_struct NMI safety Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 rcu 04/11] srcu: Check for consistent global " Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 rcu 05/11] arch/x86: Add ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS Kconfig option Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 rcu 06/11] arch/arm64: " Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 rcu 07/11] arch/loongarch: " Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 rcu 08/11] arch/s390: " Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-20 5:16 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-10-20 7:23 ` Heiko Carstens
2022-10-20 7:27 ` Heiko Carstens
2022-10-20 16:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 rcu 09/11] srcu: Warn when NMI-unsafe API is used in NMI Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 rcu 10/11] srcu: Explain the reason behind the read side critical section on GP start Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 rcu 11/11] srcu: Debug NMI safety even on archs that don't require it Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221019225846.2501109-1-paulmck@kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox