From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v3 rcu 07/11] arch/loongarch: Add ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS Kconfig option
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 15:58:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221019225846.2501109-7-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221019225838.GA2500612@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
The loongarch architecture uses the atomic read-modify-write amadd
instruction to implement this_cpu_add(), which is NMI safe. This means
that the old and more-efficient srcu_read_lock() may be used in NMI
context, without the need for srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(). Therefore, add
the new Kconfig option ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS to arch/x86/Kconfig,
which will cause NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE to be deselected, thus preserving
the current srcu_read_lock() behavior.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220910221947.171557773@linutronix.de/
Suggested-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Cc: WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>
---
arch/loongarch/Kconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
index 903096bd87f88..386adde2feffb 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ config LOONGARCH
select ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
select ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
select ARCH_HAS_ACPI_TABLE_UPGRADE if ACPI
+ select ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS
select ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL
select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
select ARCH_INLINE_READ_LOCK if !PREEMPTION
--
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-19 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-19 22:58 [PATCH rcu 0/11] NMI-safe SRCU readers for v6.2 Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 rcu 01/11] srcu: Convert ->srcu_lock_count and ->srcu_unlock_count to atomic Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 rcu 02/11] srcu: Create an srcu_read_lock_nmisafe() and srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe() Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 rcu 03/11] srcu: Check for consistent per-CPU per-srcu_struct NMI safety Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 rcu 04/11] srcu: Check for consistent global " Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 rcu 05/11] arch/x86: Add ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS Kconfig option Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 rcu 06/11] arch/arm64: " Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 22:58 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2022-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 rcu 08/11] arch/s390: " Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-20 5:16 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-10-20 7:23 ` Heiko Carstens
2022-10-20 7:27 ` Heiko Carstens
2022-10-20 16:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 rcu 09/11] srcu: Warn when NMI-unsafe API is used in NMI Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 rcu 10/11] srcu: Explain the reason behind the read side critical section on GP start Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH v3 rcu 11/11] srcu: Debug NMI safety even on archs that don't require it Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221019225846.2501109-7-paulmck@kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox