public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
	D Scott Phillips OS <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	carl@os.amperecomputing.com, lcherian@marvell.com,
	bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com,
	Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
	Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>,
	xingxin.hx@openanolis.org, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
	peternewman@google.com
Subject: [PATCH 06/18] x86/resctrl: Allow the allocator to check if a CLOSID can allocate clean RMID
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 13:11:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221021131204.5581-7-james.morse@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221021131204.5581-1-james.morse@arm.com>

MPAM's PMG bits extend its PARTID space, meaning the same PMG value can be
used for different control groups.

This means once a CLOSID is allocated, all its monitoring ids may still be
dirty, and held in limbo.

Add a helper to allow the CLOSID allocator to check if a CLOSID has dirty
RMID values. This behaviour is enabled by a kconfig option selected by
the architecture, which avoids a pointless search for x86.

Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h |  1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c  | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 18 +++++++++------
 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
index c8c46fe088be..faec12025a58 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
@@ -519,6 +519,7 @@ int rdtgroup_pseudo_lock_create(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp);
 void rdtgroup_pseudo_lock_remove(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp);
 struct rdt_domain *get_domain_from_cpu(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r);
 int closids_supported(void);
+bool resctrl_closid_is_dirty(u32 closid);
 void closid_free(int closid);
 int alloc_rmid(u32 closid);
 void free_rmid(u32 closid, u32 rmid);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
index 59da256a77fe..99854ef4dee4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
@@ -320,6 +320,37 @@ static struct rmid_entry *resctrl_find_free_rmid(u32 closid)
 	return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
 }
 
+/**
+ * resctrl_closid_is_dirty - Determine if clean RMID can be allocate for this
+ *                           CLOSID.
+ * @closid: The CLOSID that is being queried.
+ *
+ * MPAM's equivalent of RMID are per-CLOSID, meaning a freshly allocate CLOSID
+ * may not be able to allocate clean RMID. To avoid this the allocator will
+ * only return clean CLOSID.
+ */
+bool resctrl_closid_is_dirty(u32 closid)
+{
+	struct rmid_entry *entry;
+	int i;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&rdtgroup_mutex);
+
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID))
+		return false;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx(); i++) {
+		entry = &rmid_ptrs[i];
+		if (entry->closid != closid)
+			continue;
+
+		if (entry->busy)
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 /*
  * As of now the RMIDs allocation is the same in each domain.
  * However we keep track of which packages the RMIDs
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
index ac88610a6946..59f33adcf6f8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ void rdt_last_cmd_printf(const char *fmt, ...)
  * - Our choices on how to configure each resource become progressively more
  *   limited as the number of resources grows.
  */
-static int closid_free_map;
+static unsigned long closid_free_map;
 static int closid_free_map_len;
 
 int closids_supported(void)
@@ -119,14 +119,18 @@ static void closid_init(void)
 
 static int closid_alloc(void)
 {
-	u32 closid = ffs(closid_free_map);
+	u32 closid;
 
-	if (closid == 0)
-		return -ENOSPC;
-	closid--;
-	closid_free_map &= ~(1 << closid);
+	for_each_set_bit(closid, &closid_free_map, closid_free_map_len) {
+		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID) &&
+		    resctrl_closid_is_dirty(closid))
+			continue;
 
-	return closid;
+		clear_bit(closid, &closid_free_map);
+		return closid;
+	}
+
+	return -ENOSPC;
 }
 
 void closid_free(int closid)
-- 
2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-21 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-21 13:11 [PATCH 00/18] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 01/18] x86/resctrl: Track the closid with the rmid James Morse
2022-10-31 14:42   ` Peter Newman
2022-11-25  4:07   ` haoxin
2023-01-06  2:57   ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-01-10 17:57     ` James Morse
2023-01-10 18:01       ` Yu, Fenghua
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 02/18] x86/resctrl: Access per-rmid structures by index James Morse
2023-01-06  3:12   ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-01-10 17:57     ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 03/18] x86/resctrl: Create helper for RMID allocation and mondata dir creation James Morse
2023-01-06  3:23   ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-01-10 17:57     ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 04/18] x86/resctrl: Move rmid allocation out of mkdir_rdt_prepare() James Morse
2022-11-10 10:50   ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2022-11-24 14:21     ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 05/18] x86/resctrl: Allow RMID allocation to be scoped by CLOSID James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` James Morse [this message]
2022-11-08 15:57   ` [PATCH 06/18] x86/resctrl: Allow the allocator to check if a CLOSID can allocate clean RMID Shawn Wang
2022-11-09 17:02     ` James Morse
2022-11-10 10:50   ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2022-11-24 14:21     ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 07/18] x86/resctrl: Move CLOSID/RMID matching and setting to use helpers James Morse
2022-11-18 15:49   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-24 14:21     ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 08/18] x86/resctrl: Queue mon_event_read() instead of sending an IPI James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 09/18] x86/resctrl: Allow resctrl_arch_rmid_read() to sleep James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 10/18] x86/resctrl: Allow arch to allocate memory needed in resctrl_arch_rmid_read() James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 11/18] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_mounted checks explicit James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 12/18] x86/resctrl: Move alloc/mon static keys into helpers James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 13/18] x86/resctrl: Make rdt_enable_key the arch's decision to switch James Morse
2022-10-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 14/18] x86/resctrl: Add helpers for system wide mon/alloc capable James Morse
2022-11-10 10:51   ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2022-11-24 14:22     ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 15/18] x86/resctrl: Add cpu online callback for resctrl work James Morse
2022-10-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 16/18] x86/resctrl: Allow overflow/limbo handlers to be scheduled on any-but cpu James Morse
2022-10-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 17/18] x86/resctrl: Add cpu offline callback for resctrl work James Morse
2022-10-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 18/18] x86/resctrl: Separate arch and fs resctrl locks James Morse
2022-10-31 14:21   ` Peter Newman
2022-11-09 17:18     ` James Morse
2022-11-01  8:01 ` [PATCH 00/18] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2022-11-09 17:21   ` James Morse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221021131204.5581-7-james.morse@arm.com \
    --to=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=Babu.Moger@amd.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=carl@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=xingxin.hx@openanolis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox