From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
D Scott Phillips OS <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
carl@os.amperecomputing.com, lcherian@marvell.com,
bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>,
xingxin.hx@openanolis.org, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
peternewman@google.com
Subject: [PATCH 06/18] x86/resctrl: Allow the allocator to check if a CLOSID can allocate clean RMID
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 13:11:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221021131204.5581-7-james.morse@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221021131204.5581-1-james.morse@arm.com>
MPAM's PMG bits extend its PARTID space, meaning the same PMG value can be
used for different control groups.
This means once a CLOSID is allocated, all its monitoring ids may still be
dirty, and held in limbo.
Add a helper to allow the CLOSID allocator to check if a CLOSID has dirty
RMID values. This behaviour is enabled by a kconfig option selected by
the architecture, which avoids a pointless search for x86.
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 18 +++++++++------
3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
index c8c46fe088be..faec12025a58 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
@@ -519,6 +519,7 @@ int rdtgroup_pseudo_lock_create(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp);
void rdtgroup_pseudo_lock_remove(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp);
struct rdt_domain *get_domain_from_cpu(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r);
int closids_supported(void);
+bool resctrl_closid_is_dirty(u32 closid);
void closid_free(int closid);
int alloc_rmid(u32 closid);
void free_rmid(u32 closid, u32 rmid);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
index 59da256a77fe..99854ef4dee4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
@@ -320,6 +320,37 @@ static struct rmid_entry *resctrl_find_free_rmid(u32 closid)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
}
+/**
+ * resctrl_closid_is_dirty - Determine if clean RMID can be allocate for this
+ * CLOSID.
+ * @closid: The CLOSID that is being queried.
+ *
+ * MPAM's equivalent of RMID are per-CLOSID, meaning a freshly allocate CLOSID
+ * may not be able to allocate clean RMID. To avoid this the allocator will
+ * only return clean CLOSID.
+ */
+bool resctrl_closid_is_dirty(u32 closid)
+{
+ struct rmid_entry *entry;
+ int i;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&rdtgroup_mutex);
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID))
+ return false;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx(); i++) {
+ entry = &rmid_ptrs[i];
+ if (entry->closid != closid)
+ continue;
+
+ if (entry->busy)
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
/*
* As of now the RMIDs allocation is the same in each domain.
* However we keep track of which packages the RMIDs
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
index ac88610a6946..59f33adcf6f8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ void rdt_last_cmd_printf(const char *fmt, ...)
* - Our choices on how to configure each resource become progressively more
* limited as the number of resources grows.
*/
-static int closid_free_map;
+static unsigned long closid_free_map;
static int closid_free_map_len;
int closids_supported(void)
@@ -119,14 +119,18 @@ static void closid_init(void)
static int closid_alloc(void)
{
- u32 closid = ffs(closid_free_map);
+ u32 closid;
- if (closid == 0)
- return -ENOSPC;
- closid--;
- closid_free_map &= ~(1 << closid);
+ for_each_set_bit(closid, &closid_free_map, closid_free_map_len) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID) &&
+ resctrl_closid_is_dirty(closid))
+ continue;
- return closid;
+ clear_bit(closid, &closid_free_map);
+ return closid;
+ }
+
+ return -ENOSPC;
}
void closid_free(int closid)
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-21 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-21 13:11 [PATCH 00/18] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 01/18] x86/resctrl: Track the closid with the rmid James Morse
2022-10-31 14:42 ` Peter Newman
2022-11-25 4:07 ` haoxin
2023-01-06 2:57 ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-01-10 17:57 ` James Morse
2023-01-10 18:01 ` Yu, Fenghua
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 02/18] x86/resctrl: Access per-rmid structures by index James Morse
2023-01-06 3:12 ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-01-10 17:57 ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 03/18] x86/resctrl: Create helper for RMID allocation and mondata dir creation James Morse
2023-01-06 3:23 ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-01-10 17:57 ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 04/18] x86/resctrl: Move rmid allocation out of mkdir_rdt_prepare() James Morse
2022-11-10 10:50 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2022-11-24 14:21 ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 05/18] x86/resctrl: Allow RMID allocation to be scoped by CLOSID James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` James Morse [this message]
2022-11-08 15:57 ` [PATCH 06/18] x86/resctrl: Allow the allocator to check if a CLOSID can allocate clean RMID Shawn Wang
2022-11-09 17:02 ` James Morse
2022-11-10 10:50 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2022-11-24 14:21 ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 07/18] x86/resctrl: Move CLOSID/RMID matching and setting to use helpers James Morse
2022-11-18 15:49 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-24 14:21 ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 08/18] x86/resctrl: Queue mon_event_read() instead of sending an IPI James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 09/18] x86/resctrl: Allow resctrl_arch_rmid_read() to sleep James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 10/18] x86/resctrl: Allow arch to allocate memory needed in resctrl_arch_rmid_read() James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 11/18] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_mounted checks explicit James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 12/18] x86/resctrl: Move alloc/mon static keys into helpers James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 13/18] x86/resctrl: Make rdt_enable_key the arch's decision to switch James Morse
2022-10-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 14/18] x86/resctrl: Add helpers for system wide mon/alloc capable James Morse
2022-11-10 10:51 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2022-11-24 14:22 ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 15/18] x86/resctrl: Add cpu online callback for resctrl work James Morse
2022-10-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 16/18] x86/resctrl: Allow overflow/limbo handlers to be scheduled on any-but cpu James Morse
2022-10-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 17/18] x86/resctrl: Add cpu offline callback for resctrl work James Morse
2022-10-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 18/18] x86/resctrl: Separate arch and fs resctrl locks James Morse
2022-10-31 14:21 ` Peter Newman
2022-11-09 17:18 ` James Morse
2022-11-01 8:01 ` [PATCH 00/18] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2022-11-09 17:21 ` James Morse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221021131204.5581-7-james.morse@arm.com \
--to=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=Babu.Moger@amd.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=carl@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=xingxin.hx@openanolis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox