From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80DAAECAAA1 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 19:05:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232735AbiJXTEA (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2022 15:04:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42444 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232730AbiJXTDd (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2022 15:03:33 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E81B138A11; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 10:42:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 6EF1268BFE; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 17:03:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 17:03:20 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Logan Gunthorpe Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Hellwig , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Dan Williams , Jason Gunthorpe , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , John Hubbard , Don Dutile , Matthew Wilcox , Daniel Vetter , Minturn Dave B , Jason Ekstrand , Dave Hansen , Xiong Jianxin , Bjorn Helgaas , Ira Weiny , Robin Murphy , Martin Oliveira , Chaitanya Kulkarni , Ralph Campbell , Stephen Bates , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/9] Userspace P2PDMA with O_DIRECT NVMe devices Message-ID: <20221024150320.GA26731@lst.de> References: <20221021174116.7200-1-logang@deltatee.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221021174116.7200-1-logang@deltatee.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The series looks good to me know. How do we want to handle it? I think we need a special branch somewhere (maybe in the block or mm trees?) so that we can base the other iov_iter work from John on it. Also Al has a whole bunch of iov_iter changes that we probably want on the same branch as well, although some of those (READ vs WRITE fixups) look like 6.1 material to me.