public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: maxime@cerno.tech
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] clk: Warn if we register a mux without determine_rate
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 14:45:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221027214509.8EC66C433C1@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221026135215.nqndtcb2unxqwwux@houat>

Quoting maxime@cerno.tech (2022-10-26 06:52:15)
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 07:07:58PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > 
> > You can grep for it:
> > 
> >  $ git grep -W 'struct clk_ops .*='
> 
> TIL about -W. It's awesome, thanks

:)

> 
> > but I'm fairly certain a coccinelle script can detect most of these
> > because clk_ops are usually statically defined (although not always).
> > 
> > Either way I already see that 'owl_comp_div_ops' will trigger this
> > warning. And 'at91sam9x5_smd_ops' looks even more likely. Given that I'm
> > not super keen on applying this patch.
> 
> It's the reason why I didn't return an error at first, I wanted to
> report that it's invalid and let to drivers the chance to be fixed
> still.
> 
> Should I take your above comment as you'd rather have the affected
> drivers fixed in this patch and we then return an error, or is it that
> you don't want that patch at all?

You can try fixing all the drivers that are failing to meet this
requirement (found with grep) and if they are fixed we can start
printing the warning. That seems to be the practical approach to getting
this patch accepted. The TODO irks me to be honest. I'd rather we fix
everything and make it an error and be done with it.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-27 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-18 13:52 [PATCH 0/4] clk: Rate range improvements Maxime Ripard
2022-10-18 13:52 ` [PATCH 1/4] clk: Remove WARN_ON NULL parent in clk_core_init_rate_req() Maxime Ripard
2022-10-18 14:35   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-10-28  0:06   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-10-18 13:52 ` [PATCH 2/4] clk: Initialize the clk_rate_request even if clk_core is NULL Maxime Ripard
2022-10-18 14:35   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-10-28  0:09   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-10-18 13:52 ` [PATCH 3/4] clk: Initialize max_rate in struct clk_rate_request Maxime Ripard
2022-10-18 14:35   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-10-28  0:09   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-10-18 13:52 ` [PATCH 4/4] clk: Warn if we register a mux without determine_rate Maxime Ripard
2022-10-18 14:34   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-10-26  2:07   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-10-26 13:52     ` maxime
2022-10-27 21:45       ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2022-11-03 12:39         ` Maxime Ripard
2022-11-03 12:33     ` Maxime Ripard
2022-11-04 18:10       ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221027214509.8EC66C433C1@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox