From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
To: "Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
noralf@tronnes.org, "Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] dma-buf: Make locking consistent in dma_buf_detach()
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 18:44:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221030154412.8320-2-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221030154412.8320-1-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
The dma_buf_detach() locks attach->dmabuf->resv and then unlocks
dmabuf->resv, which could be a two different locks from a static
code checker perspective. In particular this triggers Smatch to
report the "double unlock" error. Make the locking pointers consistent.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/Y1fLfsccW3AS%2Fo+%2F@kili/
Fixes: 809d9c72c2f8 ("dma-buf: Move dma_buf_attach() to dynamic locking specification")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
---
drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index c40d72d318fd..13bfd2d09c56 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -995,10 +995,10 @@ static void __unmap_dma_buf(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
*/
void dma_buf_detach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
{
- if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf || !attach))
+ if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf || !attach || dmabuf != attach->dmabuf))
return;
- dma_resv_lock(attach->dmabuf->resv, NULL);
+ dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, NULL);
if (attach->sgt) {
--
2.37.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-30 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-30 15:44 [PATCH v2 0/2] Fixes for dma-buf locking issues found by Smatch Dmitry Osipenko
2022-10-30 15:44 ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]
2022-10-30 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/client: Prevent NULL dereference in drm_client_buffer_delete() Dmitry Osipenko
2022-11-02 9:15 ` Christian König
2022-11-02 11:02 ` Dmitry Osipenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221030154412.8320-2-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com \
--to=dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=noralf@tronnes.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox