From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8C6C43217 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 19:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229898AbiKAToy (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2022 15:44:54 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39746 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229533AbiKATow (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2022 15:44:52 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 714F012770; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 12:44:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D95F61715; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 19:44:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 648B3C433D6; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 19:44:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1667331891; bh=//K4QNbzYFOWo+QH+GbBMQaZSa7pLigyVZveW13UDss=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=h5CVyHDxIu+wbsgX7z2Se8He7WoX56gqzFkhqJkwj41lORQNNMOfDuXiCuAcOUPl8 2MGG1srv+1vuAO4AuSpeWJHAS6HrfUo7Uq/C6gr0CEph/LXhGwRy7Dtz2U/IK4AaQY Mabd+8rQ9hvv8tw43+VWy42C6kCTYOuA76EI8Z4HLgQXLmAX3FwMhi5U6jDh/cYUEg 4M7R0vA3swejR+0yWA1BzuoWxWBibPBHLF0AmxkE0NDvRPlpII6vsyZ1lja1x8lE+y R3XEOhmMOod8/tJQtbNwjeVUsgQnWsm56toOFuOw9uoozmVFWno2EYO4Z9KDVoIV5M V9Hbfr+JymGvQ== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20221031220751.158341-1-j.neuschaefer@gmx.net> References: <20221031220751.158341-1-j.neuschaefer@gmx.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: samsung: Fix reference to CLK_OF_DECLARE in comment From: Stephen Boyd Cc: Jonathan =?utf-8?q?Neusch=C3=A4fer?= , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Sylwester Nawrocki , Tomasz Figa , Chanwoo Choi , Alim Akhtar , Michael Turquette , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Jonathan =?utf-8?q?Neusch=C3=A4fer?= , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 12:44:49 -0700 User-Agent: alot/0.10 Message-Id: <20221101194451.648B3C433D6@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Jonathan Neusch=C3=A4fer (2022-10-31 15:07:51) > It was misspelled as OF_CLK_DECLARE. Fix it. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neusch=C3=A4fer > --- Applied to clk-next