From: Li Huafei <lihuafei1@huawei.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>, <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
<joe.lawrence@redhat.com>, <zhaogongyi@huawei.com>,
<lihuafei1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] kprobes: Update ftrace_ops when clearing ftrace-based aggrprobe's post_handler
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 18:10:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221111101006.239177-1-lihuafei1@huawei.com> (raw)
In __unregister_kprobe_top(), if the currently unregistered probe has
post_handler but other child probes of the aggrprobe do not have
post_handler, the post_handler of the aggrprobe is cleared. If this is
a ftrace-based probe, there is a problem. In later calls to
disarm_kprobe(), we will use kprobe_ftrace_ops because post_handler is
NULL. But we're armed with kprobe_ipmodify_ops. This triggers a WARN in
__disarm_kprobe_ftrace() and may even cause use-after-free:
Failed to disarm kprobe-ftrace at kernel_clone+0x0/0x3c0 (error -2)
WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 137 at kernel/kprobes.c:1135 __disarm_kprobe_ftrace.isra.21+0xcf/0xe0
Modules linked in: testKprobe_007(-)
CPU: 5 PID: 137 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.1.0-rc4-dirty #18
[...]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__disable_kprobe+0xcd/0xe0
__unregister_kprobe_top+0x12/0x150
? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
unregister_kprobes.part.23+0x31/0xa0
unregister_kprobe+0x32/0x40
__x64_sys_delete_module+0x15e/0x260
? do_user_addr_fault+0x2cd/0x6b0
do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
[...]
For ftrace kprobe, update post_handler at the same time update
ftrace_ops, moving it from kprobe_ipmodify_ops to kprobe_ftrace_ops.
Fixes: 0bc11ed5ab60 ("kprobes: Allow kprobes coexist with livepatch")
Reported-by: Zhao Gongyi <zhaogongyi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Huafei <lihuafei1@huawei.com>
---
kernel/kprobes.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index cd9f5a66a690..f8bec48a9cf9 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -1766,7 +1766,17 @@ static int __unregister_kprobe_top(struct kprobe *p)
if ((list_p != p) && (list_p->post_handler))
goto noclean;
}
- ap->post_handler = NULL;
+ /*
+ * For ftrace kprobe, we need to update ftrace_ops
+ * at the same time as we update post_handler, moving
+ * it from kprobe_ipmodify_ops to kprobe_ftrace_ops.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(kprobe_ftrace(ap))) {
+ disarm_kprobe(ap, false);
+ ap->post_handler = NULL;
+ arm_kprobe(ap);
+ } else
+ ap->post_handler = NULL;
}
noclean:
/*
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-11-11 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-11 10:10 Li Huafei [this message]
2022-11-11 15:33 ` [PATCH] kprobes: Update ftrace_ops when clearing ftrace-based aggrprobe's post_handler Masami Hiramatsu
2022-11-12 3:52 ` Li Huafei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221111101006.239177-1-lihuafei1@huawei.com \
--to=lihuafei1@huawei.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=zhaogongyi@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox