From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, john.stultz@linaro.org,
sboyd@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, Mark.Rutland@arm.com,
maz@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, neeraju@codeaurora.org,
ak@linux.intel.com, feng.tang@intel.com, zhengjun.xing@intel.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH clocksource 2/3] clocksource: Add comments to classify bogus measurements
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 15:28:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221114232827.835599-2-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221114232807.GA834337@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
An extremely busy system can delay the clocksource watchdog, so that
the corresponding too-long bogus-measurement error does not necessarily
imply an error in the system. However, a too-short bogus-measurement
error likely indicates a bug in hardware, firmware or software.
Therefore, add comments clarifying these bogus-measurement pr_warn()s.
Reported-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
---
kernel/time/clocksource.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
index dcaf38c062161..3f5317faf891f 100644
--- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
+++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
@@ -443,10 +443,12 @@ static void clocksource_watchdog(struct timer_list *unused)
/* Check for bogus measurements. */
wdi = jiffies_to_nsecs(WATCHDOG_INTERVAL);
if (wd_nsec < (wdi >> 2)) {
+ /* This usually indicates broken timer code or hardware. */
pr_warn("timekeeping watchdog on CPU%d: Watchdog clocksource '%s' advanced only %lld ns during %d-jiffy time interval, skipping watchdog check.\n", smp_processor_id(), watchdog->name, wd_nsec, WATCHDOG_INTERVAL);
continue;
}
if (wd_nsec > (wdi << 2)) {
+ /* This can happen on busy systems, which can delay the watchdog. */
pr_warn("timekeeping watchdog on CPU%d: Watchdog clocksource '%s' advanced an excessive %lld ns during %d-jiffy time interval, probable CPU overutilization, skipping watchdog check.\n", smp_processor_id(), watchdog->name, wd_nsec, WATCHDOG_INTERVAL);
continue;
}
--
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-14 23:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-14 23:28 [PATCH clocksource 0/3] Reject bogus watchdog clocksource measurements Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-14 23:28 ` [PATCH clocksource 1/3] clocksource: " Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-17 21:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-11-17 23:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-21 0:55 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-21 15:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-21 18:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-22 15:55 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-22 22:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-23 2:36 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-23 21:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-28 2:15 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-29 19:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-30 1:38 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-30 4:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-30 4:49 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-30 5:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-30 5:35 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-30 5:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-30 6:00 ` Feng Tang
2022-12-01 17:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-12-02 1:10 ` Feng Tang
2022-12-02 1:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-12-02 2:02 ` Feng Tang
2022-12-02 22:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-12-03 2:51 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-14 23:28 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2022-11-14 23:28 ` [PATCH clocksource 3/3] clocksource: Exponential backoff for load-induced bogus watchdog reads Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221114232827.835599-2-paulmck@kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zhengjun.xing@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox