public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: ira.weiny@intel.com
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@kernel.org>,
	linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/doe: Fix work struct declaration
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 11:09:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221116100939.GA32050@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221115011943.1051039-1-ira.weiny@intel.com>

On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 05:19:43PM -0800, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote:
> From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> 
> The callers of pci_doe_submit_task() allocate the pci_doe_task on the
> stack.  This causes the work structure to be allocated on the stack
> without pci_doe_submit_task() knowing.  Work item initialization needs
> to be done with either INIT_WORK_ONSTACK() or INIT_WORK() depending on
> how the work item is allocated.
> 
> Jonathan suggested creating doe task allocation macros such as
> DECLARE_CDAT_DOE_TASK_ONSTACK().[1]  The issue with this is the work
> function is not known to the callers and must be initialized correctly.
> 
> A follow up suggestion was to have an internal 'pci_doe_work' item
> allocated by pci_doe_submit_task().[2]  This requires an allocation which
> could restrict the context where tasks are used.
> 
> Compromise with an intermediate step to initialize the task struct with
> a new call pci_doe_init_task() which must be called prior to submit
> task.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20221014151045.24781-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com/T/#m88a7f50dcce52f30c8bf5c3dcc06fa9843b54a2d
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20221014151045.24781-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com/T/#m63c636c5135f304480370924f4d03c00357be667

We have object_is_on_stack(), included from <linux/sched/task_stack.h>.

So you could just autosense in pci_doe_submit_task() whether
pci_doe_task is on the stack and call the appropriate INIT_WORK
variant.

Any reason not to do that?

Thanks,

Lukas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-16 10:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-15  1:19 [PATCH] PCI/doe: Fix work struct declaration ira.weiny
2022-11-15 11:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-11-15 19:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-15 20:18   ` Ira Weiny
2022-11-15 20:41     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-15 20:54       ` Ira Weiny
2022-11-15 22:12         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-16 10:09 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2022-11-16 18:20   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-16 20:57     ` Ira Weiny
2022-11-16 21:10       ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221116100939.GA32050@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bwidawsk@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=gregory.price@memverge.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox