The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: paulmck@kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Avoid invalid wakeup for rcuc kthreads in RCU_KTHREAD_OFFCPU status
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 13:47:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221116124716.GA813995@lothringen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221115131926.3409974-1-qiang1.zhang@intel.com>

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 09:19:26PM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
> For CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y kernel, the "use_softirq=0" will be set, the
> RCU_SOFTIRQ processing is moved to per-CPU rcuc kthreads which created
> by smpboot_register_percpu_thread(). when CPU is going offline, the
> corresponding rcu_data.rcu_cpu_kthread_status is set RCU_KTHREAD_OFFCPU,
> and the rcuc kthreads enter TASK_PARKED state, kthreads in TASK_PARKED
> state only accept kthread_unpark() to wakeup.
> 
> Therefore, This commit avoid invoke wake_up_process() to rcuc kthreads
> in TASK_PARKED state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 3ccad468887e..49dd87356851 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -2375,7 +2375,8 @@ static void rcu_wake_cond(struct task_struct *t, int status)
>  	 * If the thread is yielding, only wake it when this
>  	 * is invoked from idle
>  	 */
> -	if (t && (status != RCU_KTHREAD_YIELDING || is_idle_task(current)))
> +	if (t && (status != RCU_KTHREAD_YIELDING || is_idle_task(current)) &&
> +				status != RCU_KTHREAD_OFFCPU)
>  		wake_up_process(t);

There is a tiny window where this can happen (between CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU
and CPUHP_AP_SMPBOOT_THREADS) and it can't cause a spurious unpark because
wake_up_process() only wakes up from TASK_[UN]INTERRUPTIBLE states. And even
if it did, the KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK bit would still be on.

And more important! On unpark time RCU_KTHREAD_OFFCPU isn't cleared. Only the
rcuc kthread does it, and after your patch it couldn't be awaken to perform
that, unless rcuc is lucky enough to have rcu_data.rcu_cpu_has_work = 1
by the time it unparks and that isn't guaranteed. So rcuc may sleep forever.

OTOH one cleanup that could be done is to make rcu_cpu_kthread_park() to use
__this_cpu_write as it's guaranteed that cpu == smp_processor_id().

Thanks.


  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-16 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-15 13:19 [PATCH] rcu: Avoid invalid wakeup for rcuc kthreads in RCU_KTHREAD_OFFCPU status Zqiang
2022-11-16 12:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2022-11-16 14:07   ` Zhang, Qiang1
2022-11-16 15:01     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-11-16 23:23       ` Zhang, Qiang1

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221116124716.GA813995@lothringen \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang1.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox