Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: Add MAX5970 and MAX5978

[Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>]

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 02:00:44AM +0530, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On 15-11-2022 07:34 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 15/11/2022 12:09, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> > > From: Marcello Sylvester Bauer <sylv@sylv.io>
> > > 
> > > The MAX597x is a hot swap controller with configurable fault protection.
> > > It also has 10bit ADC for current & voltage measurements.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Marcello Sylvester Bauer <sylv@sylv.io>
> > > Co-developed-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
> > > Co-developed-by: Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com>
> > > ---
> > >   .../bindings/mfd/maxim,max5970.yaml           | 154 ++++++++++++++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 154 insertions(+)
> > >   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/maxim,max5970.yaml
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/maxim,max5970.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/maxim,max5970.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..edf0c23db4ca
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/maxim,max5970.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/maxim,max5970.yaml#
> > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: Regulator for MAX5970 smart switch from Maxim Integrated.
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > +  - Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
> > > +
> > > +description: |
> > > +  The smart switch provides no output regulation, but independent fault protection
> > > +  and voltage and current sensing.
> > > +  Programming is done through I2C bus.
> > > +
> > > +  Datasheets:
> > > +    https://datasheets.maximintegrated.com/en/ds/MAX5970.pdf
> > > +    https://datasheets.maximintegrated.com/en/ds/MAX5978.pdf
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > +  compatible:
> > > +    enum:
> > > +      - maxim,max5970
> > > +      - maxim,max5978
> > > +
> > > +  reg:
> > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > +
> > > +  interrupts:
> > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > +
> > > +  leds:
> > > +    type: object
> > > +    description:
> > > +      Properties for four LEDS.
> > > +
> > > +    properties:
> > > +      "#address-cells":
> > > +        const: 1
> > > +
> > > +      "#size-cells":
> > > +        const: 0
> > > +
> > > +    patternProperties:
> > > +      "^led@[0-3]$":
> > > +        $ref: /schemas/leds/common.yaml#
> > > +        type: object
> > > +
> > > +    additionalProperties: false
> > > +
> > > +  vss1-supply:
> > > +    description: Supply of the first channel.
> > > +
> > > +  vss2-supply:
> > > +    description: Supply of the second channel.
> > > +
> > > +  regulators:
> > > +    type: object
> > > +    description:
> > > +      Properties for both regulators. Also set value for shunt resistor used.
> > 
> > You should explain not the syntax,  but what part of hardware this nodes
> > represents. Therefore "Also set value" does not fit at all. Hardware
> > sets value?
> You mean something like: Properties for power switch
> > 
> > I looked at datasheets to figure it out but they do not refer to any
> > configurable regulator, LDO nor "sw0/sw1/sw2". Therefore I have no clue
> > what to expect here...
> Yes this is for power switch part of max5970/8
> > 
> > > +
> > > +    patternProperties:
> > > +      "^sw[0-1]$":
> > > +        $ref: /schemas/regulator/regulator.yaml#
> > > +        type: object
> > > +        properties:
> > > +          shunt-resistor-micro-ohms:
> > > +            description: |
> > > +              The value of current sense resistor in microohms.
> > > +
> > > +        required:
> > > +          - shunt-resistor-micro-ohms
> > > +
> > > +      unevaluatedProperties: false
> > 
> > I don't think it has proper indentation. Did you test the binding?
> Definitely tested the bindings before I push the patch.

This kind of error was checked for 'properties', but not 
'patternProperties'. Now fixed.

Rob