From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] iommu/vt-d: Add blocking domain support
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 08:29:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221122002949.148140-4-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221122002949.148140-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
The Intel IOMMU hardwares support blocking DMA transactions by clearing
the translation table entries. This implements a real blocking domain to
avoid using an empty UNMANAGED domain. The detach_dev callback of the
domain ops is not used in any path. Remove it to avoid dead code as well.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118132451.114406-4-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
---
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index 1c1a52d1a818..603332740bc3 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(dmar_satc_units);
list_for_each_entry(rmrr, &dmar_rmrr_units, list)
static void device_block_translation(struct device *dev);
+static void intel_iommu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain);
int dmar_disabled = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_DEFAULT_ON);
int intel_iommu_sm = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SCALABLE_MODE_DEFAULT_ON);
@@ -4162,12 +4163,28 @@ static int md_domain_init(struct dmar_domain *domain, int guest_width)
return 0;
}
+static int blocking_domain_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
+ struct device *dev)
+{
+ device_block_translation(dev);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct iommu_domain blocking_domain = {
+ .ops = &(const struct iommu_domain_ops) {
+ .attach_dev = blocking_domain_attach_dev,
+ .free = intel_iommu_domain_free
+ }
+};
+
static struct iommu_domain *intel_iommu_domain_alloc(unsigned type)
{
struct dmar_domain *dmar_domain;
struct iommu_domain *domain;
switch (type) {
+ case IOMMU_DOMAIN_BLOCKED:
+ return &blocking_domain;
case IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA:
case IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_FQ:
case IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED:
@@ -4202,7 +4219,7 @@ static struct iommu_domain *intel_iommu_domain_alloc(unsigned type)
static void intel_iommu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
{
- if (domain != &si_domain->domain)
+ if (domain != &si_domain->domain && domain != &blocking_domain)
domain_exit(to_dmar_domain(domain));
}
@@ -4272,12 +4289,6 @@ static int intel_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
return domain_add_dev_info(to_dmar_domain(domain), dev);
}
-static void intel_iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
- struct device *dev)
-{
- dmar_remove_one_dev_info(dev);
-}
-
static int intel_iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain,
unsigned long iova, phys_addr_t hpa,
size_t size, int iommu_prot, gfp_t gfp)
@@ -4785,7 +4796,6 @@ const struct iommu_ops intel_iommu_ops = {
#endif
.default_domain_ops = &(const struct iommu_domain_ops) {
.attach_dev = intel_iommu_attach_device,
- .detach_dev = intel_iommu_detach_device,
.map_pages = intel_iommu_map_pages,
.unmap_pages = intel_iommu_unmap_pages,
.iotlb_sync_map = intel_iommu_iotlb_sync_map,
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-22 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-22 0:29 [PATCH 0/7] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for Linux v6.2 Lu Baolu
2022-11-22 0:29 ` [PATCH 1/7] iommu/vt-d: Allocate pasid table in device probe path Lu Baolu
2022-11-22 0:29 ` [PATCH 2/7] iommu/vt-d: Add device_block_translation() helper Lu Baolu
2022-11-22 0:29 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2022-11-22 0:29 ` [PATCH 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Rename iommu_disable_dev_iotlb() Lu Baolu
2022-11-22 0:29 ` [PATCH 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Rename domain_add_dev_info() Lu Baolu
2022-11-22 0:29 ` [PATCH 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Remove unnecessary domain_context_mapped() Lu Baolu
2022-11-22 0:29 ` [PATCH 7/7] iommu/vt-d: Use real field for indication of first level Lu Baolu
2022-11-22 9:06 ` [PATCH 0/7] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for Linux v6.2 Joerg Roedel
2022-11-22 9:41 ` Baolu Lu
2022-11-22 13:06 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221122002949.148140-4-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox