From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max@inbox.ru>
Cc: "Maxim Kiselev" <bigunclemax@gmail.com>,
"Thorsten Leemhuis" <regressions@leemhuis.info>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>,
"regressions@lists.linux.dev" <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Saravana Kannan" <saravanak@google.com>
Subject: Re: nvmem-cells regression after adding 'call of_platform_populate() for MTD partitions'
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:46:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221213104643.052d4a06@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b75a8769-0cc8-beb3-931a-6755aede3af0@inbox.ru>
Hi Maxim,
fido_max@inbox.ru wrote on Mon, 12 Dec 2022 20:57:49 +0300:
> Hi, Miquel!
>
> On 12.12.2022 19:37, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>
> > Let me try to recap the situation for all the people I just involved:
> >
> > * An Ethernet driver gets its mac address from an nvmem cell. The
> > Ethernet controller DT node then has an "nvmem-cells" property
> > pointing towards an nvmem cell.
> > * The nvmem cell comes from an mtd partition.
> > * The mtd partition is flagged with a particular compatible
> > (which is also named "nvmem-cells") to tell the kernel that the node
> > produces nvmem cells.
> > * The mtd partition itself has no driver, but is the child node of a
> > "partitions" container which has one (in this case,
> > "fixed-partitions", see the snippet below).
> >
> > Because the "nvmem-cells" property of the Ethernet node points at the
> > nvmem-cell node, the core create a device link between the Ethernet
> > controller (consumer) and the mtd partition (producer).
> >
> > The device link in this case will never be satisfied because no driver
> > matches the "nvmem-cells" compatible of the partition node.
> >
> > Reverting commit bcdf0315a61a ("mtd: call of_platform_populate() for MTD
> > partitions") would IMHO not make much sense, the problem comes from the
> > device link side and even there, there is nothing really "wrong",
> > because I really expect the mtd device to be ready before the
> > Ethernet controller probe, the device link is legitimate.
> >
> > So I would like to explore other alternatives. Here are a bunch of
> > ideas, but I'm open:
>
> How about to create simple driver with compatible="nvmem-cell" and to move all the suff from main mtd driver which serves nvmem-cell to the probe function?
This is probably worth the try but I doubt you can make it work without
regressions because IIRC the nvmem registration happens no matter the
compatible (not mentioning the user-otp and factory-otp cases). You can
definitely try this out if you think you can come up with something
though.
But I would like to hear from the device-link gurus :) because even if
we fix mtd with a "trick" like above, I guess we'll very likely find
other corner cases like that and I am interested in understanding the
rationale of what could be a proper fix.
Thanks,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-13 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CALHCpMgSZOZdOGpLwTYf0sFD5EMNL7CuqHuFJV_6w5VPSWZnUw@mail.gmail.com>
2022-12-10 9:52 ` Fwd: nvmem-cells regression after adding 'call of_platform_populate() for MTD partitions' Maxim Kiselev
2022-12-10 12:35 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-12-11 8:26 ` Maxim Kiselev
2022-12-12 9:14 ` Miquel Raynal
2022-12-12 13:06 ` Maxim Kiselev
2022-12-12 16:37 ` Miquel Raynal
2022-12-12 17:57 ` Maxim Kochetkov
2022-12-13 9:46 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2022-12-13 11:02 ` Maxim Kiselev
2022-12-13 16:54 ` Miquel Raynal
2022-12-14 21:53 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-12-16 11:04 ` Miquel Raynal
2022-12-16 11:33 ` Maxim Kiselev
2022-12-16 13:13 ` Maxim Kiselev
2022-12-17 1:44 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-12-17 1:45 ` Saravana Kannan
2023-02-24 16:15 ` Fwd: " Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221213104643.052d4a06@xps-13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=bigunclemax@gmail.com \
--cc=fido_max@inbox.ru \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox