From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Wei Wang <wvw@google.com>,
Midas Chien <midaschieh@google.com>,
Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] pstore: Switch pmsg_lock to an rt_mutex to avoid priority inversion
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 14:53:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202212141453.C79E68F@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221205203253.3923812-1-jstultz@google.com>
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 08:32:53PM +0000, John Stultz wrote:
> Wei Wang reported seeing priority inversion caused latencies
> caused by contention on pmsg_lock, and suggested it be switched
> to a rt_mutex.
>
> I was initially hesitant this would help, as the tasks in that
> trace all seemed to be SCHED_NORMAL, so the benefit would be
> limited to only nice boosting.
>
> However, another similar issue was raised where the priority
> inversion was seen did involve a blocked RT task so it is clear
> this would be helpful in that case.
>
> Feedback would be appreciate!
This looks fine to me. Is there an appropriate "Fixes:" tag that could
be used?
-Kees
>
> Cc: Wei Wang <wvw@google.com>
> Cc: Midas Chien<midaschieh@google.com>
> Cc: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>
> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Cc: kernel-team@android.com
> Reported-by: Wei Wang <wvw@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
> ---
> fs/pstore/pmsg.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/pstore/pmsg.c b/fs/pstore/pmsg.c
> index d8542ec2f38c..18cf94b597e0 100644
> --- a/fs/pstore/pmsg.c
> +++ b/fs/pstore/pmsg.c
> @@ -7,9 +7,10 @@
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/fs.h>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +#include <linux/rtmutex.h>
> #include "internal.h"
>
> -static DEFINE_MUTEX(pmsg_lock);
> +static DEFINE_RT_MUTEX(pmsg_lock);
>
> static ssize_t write_pmsg(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> @@ -28,9 +29,9 @@ static ssize_t write_pmsg(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> if (!access_ok(buf, count))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> - mutex_lock(&pmsg_lock);
> + rt_mutex_lock(&pmsg_lock);
> ret = psinfo->write_user(&record, buf);
> - mutex_unlock(&pmsg_lock);
> + rt_mutex_unlock(&pmsg_lock);
> return ret ? ret : count;
> }
>
> --
> 2.39.0.rc0.267.gcb52ba06e7-goog
>
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-14 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-05 20:32 [RFC PATCH] pstore: Switch pmsg_lock to an rt_mutex to avoid priority inversion John Stultz
2022-12-14 22:53 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-12-14 23:08 ` John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202212141453.C79E68F@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=anton@enomsg.org \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=connoro@google.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=midaschieh@google.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=wvw@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox