[PATCH 5.10 00/15] 5.10.160-rc1 review

[PATCH 5.10 00/15] 5.10.160-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release.
There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.160-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 5.10.160-rc1

Lei Rao <lei.rao@intel.com>
    nvme-pci: clear the prp2 field when not used

Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
    ASoC: cs42l51: Correct PGA Volume minimum value

Yasushi SHOJI <yasushi.shoji@gmail.com>
    can: mcba_usb: Fix termination command argument

Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
    can: sja1000: fix size of OCR_MODE_MASK define

Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
    pinctrl: meditatek: Startup with the IRQs disabled

Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
    libbpf: Use page size as max_entries when probing ring buffer map

Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
    ASoC: ops: Check bounds for second channel in snd_soc_put_volsw_sx()

Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
    ASoC: fsl_micfil: explicitly clear CHnF flags

Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
    ASoC: fsl_micfil: explicitly clear software reset bit

Bing-Jhong Billy Jheng <billy@starlabs.sg>
    io_uring: add missing item types for splice request

Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
    fuse: always revalidate if exclusive create

Jialiang Wang <wangjialiang0806@163.com>
    nfp: fix use-after-free in area_cache_get()

Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
    vfs: fix copy_file_range() averts filesystem freeze protection

Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
    vfs: fix copy_file_range() regression in cross-fs copies

Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
    x86/smpboot: Move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                                           |  4 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c                    |  2 -
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c                          |  1 +
 drivers/net/can/usb/mcba_usb.c                     | 10 ++-
 .../ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_cppcore.c   |  3 +-
 drivers/nvme/host/pci.c                            |  2 +
 drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c                |  9 ++-
 fs/fuse/dir.c                                      |  2 +-
 fs/io_uring.c                                      |  2 +-
 fs/nfsd/vfs.c                                      |  8 +-
 fs/read_write.c                                    | 90 +++++++++++++---------
 include/linux/can/platform/sja1000.h               |  2 +-
 include/linux/fs.h                                 |  8 ++
 sound/soc/codecs/cs42l51.c                         |  2 +-
 sound/soc/fsl/fsl_micfil.c                         | 19 +++++
 sound/soc/soc-ops.c                                |  6 ++
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c                      |  2 +-
 17 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/15] 5.10.160-rc1 review

[Pavel Machek]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 661 bytes --]

Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

CIP testing did not find any problems here:

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>

Best regards,
                                                                Pavel
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/15] 5.10.160-rc1 review

[Shuah Khan]

On 12/15/22 11:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.160-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/15] 5.10.160-rc1 review

[Rudi Heitbaum]

On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 07:10:27PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Hi Greg,

5.10.160-rc1 tested.

Run tested on:
- Intel Skylake x86_64 (nuc6 i5-6260U)

In addition - build tested for:
- Allwinner A64
- Allwinner H3
- Allwinner H5
- Allwinner H6
- Rockchip RK3288
- Rockchip RK3328
- Rockchip RK3399pro

Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com>
--
Rudi

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/15] 5.10.160-rc1 review

[Allen Pais]

>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.160-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.

Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>

Thanks.

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/15] 5.10.160-rc1 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 23:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.160-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.160-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: a66782e1af759c5fff50b1b382ff4e34fe8fe158
* git describe: v5.10.159-16-ga66782e1af75
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.159-16-ga66782e1af75

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.158-99-g2c8c8e98b2ec)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.158-99-g2c8c8e98b2ec)

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.158-99-g2c8c8e98b2ec)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.158-99-g2c8c8e98b2ec)

## Test result summary
total: 141503, pass: 122877, fail: 2557, skip: 15573, xfail: 496

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 151 total, 148 passed, 3 failed
* arm64: 49 total, 46 passed, 3 failed
* i386: 39 total, 37 passed, 2 failed
* mips: 31 total, 29 passed, 2 failed
* parisc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 32 total, 25 passed, 7 failed
* riscv: 16 total, 14 passed, 2 failed
* s390: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 42 total, 40 passed, 2 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/15] 5.10.160-rc1 review

[Jon Hunter]

On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 19:10:27 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.160-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v5.10:
    11 builds:	11 pass, 0 fail
    28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
    75 tests:	75 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	5.10.160-rc1-ga66782e1af75
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
                tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
                tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/15] 5.10.160-rc1 review

[Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)]

Hi Greg,

On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 07:10:27PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20221127):
mips: 63 configs -> no failure
arm: 104 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2362
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2366


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

-- 
Regards
Sudip

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/15] 5.10.160-rc1 review

[Florian Fainelli]

On 12/15/22 10:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.160-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on 
BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/15] 5.10.160-rc1 review

[Guenter Roeck]

On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 07:10:27PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 162 pass: 162 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 475 pass: 475 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/15] 5.10.160-rc1 review

[zhouzhixiu]

On 2022/12/16 2:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.160-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> -------------
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.160-rc1,

Kernel 
repo:https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Branch: linux-5.10.y
Version: 5.10.160-rc1
Commit: a66782e1af759c5fff50b1b382ff4e34fe8fe158
Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)

arm64:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 9023
passed: 9023
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------

x86:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 9023
passed: 9023
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot <hulkrobot@huawei.com>