From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72784C4167B for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 17:24:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231804AbiLPRX5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2022 12:23:57 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40596 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231787AbiLPRXn (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2022 12:23:43 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1DF7747D8 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 09:23:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 2BGHINAG022024; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 11:18:23 -0600 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 2BGHILVe022023; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 11:18:21 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 11:18:21 -0600 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Christophe Leroy Cc: Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan-Benedict Glaw Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: Pass correct CPU reference to assembler Message-ID: <20221216171821.GA25951@gate.crashing.org> References: <01fe73614988e2402a7526fb6b6e903bc3777bb5.1671179743.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01fe73614988e2402a7526fb6b6e903bc3777bb5.1671179743.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 09:35:50AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote: > The problem comes from the fact that CONFIG_PPC_E500MC is selected for > both the e500mc (32 bits) and the e5500 (64 bits), and therefore the > following makefile rule is wrong: > > cpu-as-$(CONFIG_PPC_E500MC) += $(call as-option,-Wa$(comma)-me500mc) Yes. > Today we have CONFIG_TARGET_CPU which provides the identification of the > expected CPU, it is used for GCC. Use it as well for the assembler. Why do you use -Wa, at all for this? The compiler should already pass proper options always! > +cpu-as-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64) += $(call as-option,-Wa$(comma)-many) What is this for? Using -many is a huge step back, it hides many problems :-( Segher